Welcome to American politics at Christian Forums. It has been this way since at least 2005. Not criticizing AT ALL, but MAGA is tribalism....
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Welcome to American politics at Christian Forums. It has been this way since at least 2005. Not criticizing AT ALL, but MAGA is tribalism....They... pfft.
We've been reduced to pure, unadulterated tribalism. What a disgrace.
My senses tell me it's getting a little thick these days...Welcome to American politics at Christian Forums. It has been this way since at least 2005. Not criticizing AT ALL, but MAGA is tribalism....
The point is trump claims that millions and millions of voter fraud votes cheated him out of the election. Yet, most every time one example of voter fraud is discovered it has been a republican voter.I don't usually devolve into these type of discussions, but what are the Democrats saying about this?
They vehemently rebuke Trump when he says voter fraud, so they can't acknowledge fraud in that sense, but... if they voted Republican? That gets tempting. Lol
Are registered Democrats obligated to vote in step with their declared party?They've added a new fallacy: No True Republican
All 5% of democrats....All the men were named Manchin and the women were named Sinema.Are registered Democrats obligated to vote in step with their declared party?
Many voted for Trump in 2016.
I don't always get sarcasm, but it looks like you guys are playing.
Are there really people that naïve...?
You've heard of New True Scotsman?Are registered Democrats obligated to vote in step with their declared party?
Many voted for Trump in 2016.
I don't always get sarcasm, but it looks like you guys are playing.
Are there really people that naïve...?
That shouldn't come as a huge surprise...I predict it's a Cuban Republican...
(reads OP)
Nailed it!
I have a hard time believing that you would honestly proffer "No True Scotsman" and completely dismiss "false flag.*"You've heard of New True Scotsman?
Well, it sure sounded like the woman was registered republican but might have voted democrat and thus was no true republican... A deflection from the facts available.
Whu?I have a hard time believing that you would honestly proffer "True Scotsman" and dismiss "false flag.*"
It smacks of gaslighting.
*"False flag" has not been proven, either, but I do not see how we can make an unassailable determination with only the information given.
Which part is unclear?Whu?
I am not proffering "no true republican". I'm suggesting that the idea that the proposal that if this person voted democrat they weren't actually a Republican is a fallacy and based on no data whatsoever.Which part is unclear?
And you know (& can prove) this, how?Your potential false flag is just deflection.
I don't need to prove. You've asserted without evidence and I have, therefore, dismissed your assertion.And you know (& can prove) this, how?
The arguments about fraud is "widespread fraud significant enough to impact the election outcome"I don't usually devolve into these type of discussions, but what are the Democrats saying about this?
They vehemently rebuke Trump when he says voter fraud, so they can't acknowledge fraud in that sense, but... if they voted Republican? That gets tempting. Lol
My bet is she could have gotten off with community service and probation. That is until she lied under oath. And about something that was sure to be confirmed once someone decided to look at her specifically.Hopefully the sentencing won't be too heavy handed for such a lightweight crime.
And you assert that she voted Republican with no such corroborating evidence...I don't need to prove. You've asserted without evidence and I have, therefore, dismissed your assertion.
No. I assert she voted *as* a Republican as all the evidence indicates.And you assert that she voted Republican with no such corroborating evidence...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?