Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Federal Court denies Donald's attempt to overturn PA certification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 75549822" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>Incorrect. If a person cannot support his arguments are it takes is an act of repudiation to refute that person. You have not provided any evidence for your claims. Over thirty cases have been quickly ended when the Trump supporters could not provide any evidence for their allegations.</p><p></p><p>What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.</p><p></p><p>When I have made specific claims I have supported them. For example when I claimed that the Georgia mail in ballots were verified. I provided a link to a reliable source supporting that claim. Meanwhile you duck and dodge questions that show you to be wrong You have tacitly admitted that you are wrong several times by doing so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 75549822, member: 321072"] Incorrect. If a person cannot support his arguments are it takes is an act of repudiation to refute that person. You have not provided any evidence for your claims. Over thirty cases have been quickly ended when the Trump supporters could not provide any evidence for their allegations. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. When I have made specific claims I have supported them. For example when I claimed that the Georgia mail in ballots were verified. I provided a link to a reliable source supporting that claim. Meanwhile you duck and dodge questions that show you to be wrong You have tacitly admitted that you are wrong several times by doing so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Federal Court denies Donald's attempt to overturn PA certification
Top
Bottom