Hans Blaster
Beardo
- Mar 11, 2017
- 22,674
- 16,966
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not a narrative. It is an interview with Mr. Kirk.You do realize that narrative in that link was published by members of the Democratic Party, right?
Are you asserting that Kirk didn't take the 5th when asked about deleting his text messages? (and virtually everything else he was asked about)You do realize that narrative in that link was published by members of the Democratic Party, right?
Nah, only 48.9% do.I cannot wait until progressive left wing liberals realize that the majority of Americans have rejected leftists ideology.
Jack Smith SPIED on GOP SENATORS. Kash Patel has fired the FBI agents who spied on US SENATORS.
Ron Johnson, at least, was an active co-conspirator in this activity.
Idk I think the federal bureau of investigations is specifically tasked with investigating federal crimes.They were not false electors. The FBI has ZERO authority to spy on Senators.
Fake. False. Fraudulent. Choose your own word, but they were not the electors counted for the state of Wisconsin.They were not false electors. The FBI has ZERO authority to spy on Senators.
Where was he questioned at? What kind of proceeding?Are you asserting that Kirk didn't take the 5th when asked about deleting his text messages? (and virtually everything else he was asked about)
Given the putative topic of this thread, what do you make of the fact that Kirk was not targeted by any criminal indictments, despite him fiffing his way through this interview? He was specifically instructed that...
I will also note that the Fifth Amendment provides a witness the ability to refuse
to answer a question if they have a reasonable belief that a truthful answer could be used
against them in a criminal prosecution, not simply because the witness would prefer not
to answer the question.
Hans Blaster provided a transcript of his deposition to a Congressional Committee in post 16.Where was he questioned at? What kind of proceeding?
Stolen election claims? Idk. That’s for them to figure out.And what was the probable cause?
The FBI has absolutely ZERO AUTHORITY to spy on anyone in Congress.Fake. False. Fraudulent. Choose your own word, but they were not the electors counted for the state of Wisconsin.
Wisconsin prosecution of fake electors
State of Wisconsin v. Kenneth Chesebro, et al. is a state criminal prosecution concerning the Trump fake electors plot in Wisconsin. The three defendants, Kenneth J. Chesebro, Michael A. Roman, and James R. Troupis, were lawyers and political aides to Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign involved in planning and producing fraudulent electoral vote paperwork as part of a plot to replace or nullify the official electoral votes of the state of Wisconsin in the 2020 presidential election.
The fraudulent paperwork was passed to U.S. Senator Ron Johnson and his chief of staff. They then attempted to convey the paperwork to Vice President Mike Pence before the certification of electoral votes on January 6, 2021, but Pence staff refused the documents.
Because they're fake.
Well yes, given an investigation of an attempt to steal an election where those of congress were participating, like Ron Johnson, then phone records need subpoenas.The FBI has absolutely ZERO AUTHORITY to spy on anyone in Congress.
The FBI has absolutely ZERO AUTHORITY to spy on anyone in Congress.
Nope.Well yes, given an investigation of an attempt to steal an election where those of congress were participating, like Ron Johnson, then phone records need subpoenas.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?