Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Entertainment
The Small Screen
Famous Satanist promoted Television
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sistrin" data-source="post: 69216825" data-attributes="member: 309500"><p>My intent wasn't to start a debate centered around the show "Without A Trace," I was only using that controversy as an example. However given your response I looked the IMDB history of the show. I didn't know it ran for as long as it did, and I admit I never watched it. I was kind of busy during those years, 2002 through next decade, and saw very little television broadcast during that time period at all. I did however see the O'Reilly Factor reporting on that episode as I was home on leave that week and I recall marveling over the series of lame excuses offered in defense of the episode by the CBS executive featured. O'Reilly aired portions of the scene in question, and regardless of whatever justification anyone offers it was a bunch of fourteen years old children engaging in activities usually reserved for the plot of a Spike Lee movie.</p><p></p><p>It is also interesting to note the scene in question is blocked content today. I could not find one website where a clip was available without having to pay or sign up for a service first. Odd for such a "remarkably tame" scene, wouldn't you think?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I used that particular controversy as an example. As to context of the scene, however, as always beauty is in the eye of the beholder. From TV dot Com, quote:</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>best wat episode</strong></span></p><p></p><p>By misstexas21, Jun 16, 2007</p><p></p><p><em>"our sons and daughters is my favorite episode. <u>it showed a realistic side of what teens really do and who they are. from the parties to the relationships, everything was pretty much on target</u>. the dialogue was very real as well. this episode keeps you guessing from the beginning. the ending was sad but fantastic and extremely shocking. some of the scenes were a little scandalous and got cbs in a some trouble but that was exactly what the epsiode should of had. our sons and daughters was a phenominal epsiode and there needs to be more like this in the episodes to come on without a trace."</em></p><p></p><p>I sincerely hope miss texas survived into adulthood.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is the specific topic, and although you are correct that in programming sex and violence sells advertising you are wrong that satanist are not taking full advantage of television programming as a means to promote their message and agenda. From IMDB:</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px">Lucifer: Satan takes up residence in Los Angeles.</span></strong></p><p></p><p>Source: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4052886/" target="_blank">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4052886/</a></p><p></p><p>A television show featuring satan as the male lead. Given "Leave it to Beaver" as the base line, do you realize how much effort and manipulation it would take to foster an environment where a show such as this could be aired? Satanist use the same methodology as promoters of political ideology, they target the young. Satanist first employ subtle imagery and verbiage as enticements fostering interest in the occult and their ideology, then gradually yet dramatically harden the imagery employed. The series "Charmed" is a prime example of this methodology. "Charmed" introduced the youth of the 2000's to witchcraft. Those youth grew up to have children of their own who are now treated to efforts such as 13 Witches and the American Horror Story series "Coven".</p><p></p><p>In truth I feel bad about posting this here, but to illustrate my point please take a moment to consider these two images from the FX television show "American Horror Story: Coven." Tell me if you don't see the full flower of satanic imagery and influence on display:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a640/sevenofeleven2000/Top%20Ten%20List/AHC%20Coven_zpskp7bfxu9.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p><img src="http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a640/sevenofeleven2000/Top%20Ten%20List/ACH%20Coven%202_zpsxf824ecc.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>The first image is a promotional shot meant to draw interest to the show. The second is from one of the episodes. Both have been carefully crafted to accomplish two goals, entice the young viewer and promote the message.</p><p></p><p>The first image is rife with satanic imagery and I could break it down if there were an interest. But two points about the second image. Note the age of the four followers. Or in context of the show the four initiates. They are from the precise age group satanist target for assimilation. Four young girls led by an older woman exuding power and control. Note also the sign in the background. The word "Vacherie" is, of course, French, and is the name of a town in New Orleans. However the English translation of "Vacherie" is "wickedness". </p><p></p><p>Do you really believe all of this is only about selling advertising? The truth is there for any to see. Start with a series as innocuous as "Bewitched" and years later you have "Coven." Communist theory in practice, conquer from within.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I am sure that explains "Wicked City." But as the saying goes, "all of satan's apples have worms."</p><p></p><p>As a side note did you ever wonder why the series "Star Trek The Next Generation" is still broadcast so heavily some twenty years after it finished its run? True, Star Trek has a core following, but I believe one reason is people know they can watch it without being subjected to "such gratuitous measures."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When limiting the discussion to the quality of television shows as produced, I agree with your point here. I never watched "Breaking Bad" but I did watch some of "Boardwalk Empire." I thought it slickly produced and interesting. At least for awhile. It became predicable rather quickly, and I lost interest. "House" was a fantastic show, even given they sometimes pushed the decency lines as far as they could. But shows such as "House" are rare. I am a firm believer in the Sturgeon Principal, which when applied to television simply states 90% of television is crap.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sistrin, post: 69216825, member: 309500"] My intent wasn't to start a debate centered around the show "Without A Trace," I was only using that controversy as an example. However given your response I looked the IMDB history of the show. I didn't know it ran for as long as it did, and I admit I never watched it. I was kind of busy during those years, 2002 through next decade, and saw very little television broadcast during that time period at all. I did however see the O'Reilly Factor reporting on that episode as I was home on leave that week and I recall marveling over the series of lame excuses offered in defense of the episode by the CBS executive featured. O'Reilly aired portions of the scene in question, and regardless of whatever justification anyone offers it was a bunch of fourteen years old children engaging in activities usually reserved for the plot of a Spike Lee movie. It is also interesting to note the scene in question is blocked content today. I could not find one website where a clip was available without having to pay or sign up for a service first. Odd for such a "remarkably tame" scene, wouldn't you think? Again, I used that particular controversy as an example. As to context of the scene, however, as always beauty is in the eye of the beholder. From TV dot Com, quote: [SIZE=4][B]best wat episode[/B][/SIZE] By misstexas21, Jun 16, 2007 [I]"our sons and daughters is my favorite episode. [U]it showed a realistic side of what teens really do and who they are. from the parties to the relationships, everything was pretty much on target[/U]. the dialogue was very real as well. this episode keeps you guessing from the beginning. the ending was sad but fantastic and extremely shocking. some of the scenes were a little scandalous and got cbs in a some trouble but that was exactly what the epsiode should of had. our sons and daughters was a phenominal epsiode and there needs to be more like this in the episodes to come on without a trace."[/I] I sincerely hope miss texas survived into adulthood. This is the specific topic, and although you are correct that in programming sex and violence sells advertising you are wrong that satanist are not taking full advantage of television programming as a means to promote their message and agenda. From IMDB: [B][SIZE=4]Lucifer: Satan takes up residence in Los Angeles.[/SIZE][/B] Source: [URL]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4052886/[/URL] A television show featuring satan as the male lead. Given "Leave it to Beaver" as the base line, do you realize how much effort and manipulation it would take to foster an environment where a show such as this could be aired? Satanist use the same methodology as promoters of political ideology, they target the young. Satanist first employ subtle imagery and verbiage as enticements fostering interest in the occult and their ideology, then gradually yet dramatically harden the imagery employed. The series "Charmed" is a prime example of this methodology. "Charmed" introduced the youth of the 2000's to witchcraft. Those youth grew up to have children of their own who are now treated to efforts such as 13 Witches and the American Horror Story series "Coven". In truth I feel bad about posting this here, but to illustrate my point please take a moment to consider these two images from the FX television show "American Horror Story: Coven." Tell me if you don't see the full flower of satanic imagery and influence on display: [IMG]http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a640/sevenofeleven2000/Top%20Ten%20List/AHC%20Coven_zpskp7bfxu9.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a640/sevenofeleven2000/Top%20Ten%20List/ACH%20Coven%202_zpsxf824ecc.gif[/IMG] The first image is a promotional shot meant to draw interest to the show. The second is from one of the episodes. Both have been carefully crafted to accomplish two goals, entice the young viewer and promote the message. The first image is rife with satanic imagery and I could break it down if there were an interest. But two points about the second image. Note the age of the four followers. Or in context of the show the four initiates. They are from the precise age group satanist target for assimilation. Four young girls led by an older woman exuding power and control. Note also the sign in the background. The word "Vacherie" is, of course, French, and is the name of a town in New Orleans. However the English translation of "Vacherie" is "wickedness". Do you really believe all of this is only about selling advertising? The truth is there for any to see. Start with a series as innocuous as "Bewitched" and years later you have "Coven." Communist theory in practice, conquer from within. Yeah, I am sure that explains "Wicked City." But as the saying goes, "all of satan's apples have worms." As a side note did you ever wonder why the series "Star Trek The Next Generation" is still broadcast so heavily some twenty years after it finished its run? True, Star Trek has a core following, but I believe one reason is people know they can watch it without being subjected to "such gratuitous measures." When limiting the discussion to the quality of television shows as produced, I agree with your point here. I never watched "Breaking Bad" but I did watch some of "Boardwalk Empire." I thought it slickly produced and interesting. At least for awhile. It became predicable rather quickly, and I lost interest. "House" was a fantastic show, even given they sometimes pushed the decency lines as far as they could. But shows such as "House" are rare. I am a firm believer in the Sturgeon Principal, which when applied to television simply states 90% of television is crap. Agreed. Thanks for the debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Entertainment
The Small Screen
Famous Satanist promoted Television
Top
Bottom