- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So I'm supposed to do the work of proving someone else's point? I figure if someone can't be bothered to support their own argument why should I?This is the part of the OP that interests you. It doesn't much interest me, but I took a look anyway and found the story within 1 minute.
Why should I? I was enough sure it wasn't true that I figured "If it was true, why won't anyone post a link to prove it?"If you were really interested in that story, you would invest a minute.
Huh, I notice you still haven't provided a link to support the OP.Since you are unwilling to do a minute of leg work to discover the facts behind the story, you are simply not interesting enough to me to continue a conversation with.
...you say something, don't offer any proof for it, then mutter about not having to prove anything when asked for proof? That's how it works for you?That is how it works, with me.
Are you leaving?Bye By tulc.
So I'm supposed to do the work of proving someone else's point? I figure if someone can't be bothered to support their own argument why should I?
Why should I? I was enough sure it wasn't true that I figured "If it was true, why won't anyone post a link to prove it?"
Huh, I notice you still haven't provided a link to support the OP.
...you say something, don't offer any proof for it, then mutter about not having to prove anything when asked for proof? That's how it works for you?
Are you leaving?
tulc(is going to miss SolomonVII)
I see President Trump isn't the only one who likes fake covers.At least they admitted it, and that is the first step in fake news addiction. Next step is realizing you are powerless, & when you are called out on it, that you still cannot quit publishing fake news. It's called a cycle of bondage. View attachment 200513
So I'm supposed to do the work of proving someone else's point? I figure if someone can't be bothered to support their own argument why should I?
Why should I? I was enough sure it wasn't true that I figured "If it was true, why won't anyone post a link to prove it?"
Huh, I notice you still haven't provided a link to support the OP.
...you say something, don't offer any proof for it, then mutter about not having to prove anything when asked for proof? That's how it works for you?
Are you leaving?
tulc(is going to miss SolomonVII)
I see President Trump isn't the only one who likes fake covers.
tulc(guesses it's easier then facing the truth about President Trump)
If you mean this:he already posted a link to trumps 500k jobs, you read right over it and are still asking for proof. I agree with him, eventually if you wont read what is posted, you should do your own google search.
could you point out where the link to the story is in that post?According to CNN, 533000 jobs were added to the economy in the first three months of the Trump presidency.
They of course have their own spin on that news.
Fake news.
I know the fact that CNN provided. You don'tSo I'm supposed to do the work of proving someone else's point? I figure if someone can't be bothered to support their own argument why should I?
If you are interested, then it is up to you to find out.
I have the link right here.Why should I? I was enough sure it wasn't true that I figured "If it was true, why won't anyone post a link to prove it?"
It would take nothing for me to post it. But I am not going to. I already offered the information. I don't care if you don't believe me. It is your loss, not mine. I already have seen the figures that CNN provided, that verifies the OP information.
You were the one that wanted to discuss that aspect of the information.
Find the link and prove me right or wrong.
I found it. You can too.
I have provided my link now on several occasions. Nobody wants to discuss what I want to discuss about the OP.Huh, I notice you still haven't provided a link to support the OP.
So be it.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
I don't need to prove it to myself....you say something, don't offer any proof for it, then mutter about not having to prove anything when asked for proof? That's how it works for you?
And if you are actually interested, it is only a minute away.
Supposedly, this is what you were interested in, so it is on you to help yourself to readily available information. I presume you are not a baby, and do not need to be spoon fed.
Bye bye tulc.Are you leaving?
tulc(is going to miss SolomonVII)
If you want to discuss what I am interested in, follow the links I have provided.
Otherwise bye, bye.
wait...I have to support some point I made? I thought we weren't required to prove anything, we simply make a statement and people are supposed to look it up for themselves.
tulc(isn't that how it works?)
we've all heard of MAGA (make america great again), but what about MSM's take on it? (MSM = main stream media) They don't believe in MAGA, they believe in MAMA (make america mexico again),
read more here:
'Make America Mexico Again' Hat Maker: Satire Can Change ConversationView attachment 200516
The US economy added 533,000 jobs in the first three months of the year, according to Labor Department data,..
CNN Money News Patrick Gillespie
April 25,2017
It is another path to the same link I posted before.it's blocked on my cpu, but I will check it out on my phone.
Its a tease just to further demonstrate that the actual facts are of no interest to him.you already mentioned that too, him. Don't repeat. Make him read the thread.
red herring. Totally arbitrary to this debate.Good night, how old is that video? Obama's still got dark hair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?