Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, but plenty of other people were. Some of them wrote about what was going on then, and none of them mentioned getting wet.You were there?
Or was there here?
(As uniformitarianism teaches.)
No, but plenty of other people were. Some of them wrote about what was going on then, and none of them mentioned getting wet.
No, because we have actual evidence that many people got shot, We also have actual evidence of relatively advanced civilizations which continuous uninterrupted existence through the supposed time of the flood.Would you believe me, if tomorrow I wrote I was at the battle of Gettysburg, and no one got shot?
No, because we have actual evidence that many people got shot, We also have actual evidence of relatively advanced civilizations which continuous uninterrupted existence through the supposed time of the flood.
We also have actual evidence of relatively advanced civilizations which continuous uninterrupted existence through the supposed time of the flood.
If there'd been a flood, that fact would disprove evolution - and a huge body of geology.
No, real archaeological evidence.Only on paper.
You'd have to have actual evidence that the flood took place. Got any?I've never heard this before, but if I start using it as proof that evolution is wrong, will you understand what I'm saying?
Put another way:
May I quote you on this?
No, real archaeological evidence.
You'd have to have actual evidence that the flood took place. Got any?
Only on paper.
It's still only on paper.That paper is a confession, written by the One who orchestrated everything.
And insisting you act on it.
It's still only on paper.
We also have actual evidence of relatively advanced civilizations which continuous uninterrupted existence through the supposed time of the flood.
The writer is not claiming to be a reporter. You still have not answered the very basic question. What is factually incorrect about the article? And what gives you the right to declare "phony"? Because it does not agree with the evolutionist "theory"?
So far, absolutely nowhere. This does not mean there might not be such evidence, but the extensive research by explorers, archaeologists, historians and anthropologists does not even provide a hint that such a civilisation may have existed. (Despite lurid attempts to misrepresent mundane data and dress it up in dramatic, but ill fitting clothes.) You're welcome.I've very often thought that an advanced civilization lived before the flood, where can I find evidence for this ? Thanks
So far, absolutely nowhere. This does not mean there might not be such evidence, but the extensive research by explorers, archaeologists, historians and anthropologists does not even provide a hint that such a civilisation may have existed. (Despite lurid attempts to misrepresent mundane data and dress it up in dramatic, but ill fitting clothes.) You're welcome
Excellent question.
He didn't.
Since one of those two scenarios is wrong, I have to assume He didn't.
He did just what He said He did, in the order He did it, etc.
A scientific fact can be wrong.
And if a scientific fact can be wrong, a scientific fact can be right.
By way of example, He made the earth before the sun.
It's scientists that put the sun before the earth.
Then they blame it on His documentation.
I can see I need to apologise to @BCP1928 for jumping to a concussion. I confused his forum name with a similar named member who routinely talks nonsense and read into his comments about "advanced civilisations" the fantasies contstructed by the likes of Graham Hancock. On reflection it is clear he is speaking about the civilisations in the Indus valley, or China. Those are well established, plenty of evidence, no meaningful doubt. So, my apoligies.Well @BCP1928 said he has evidence of an advanced civilization, so I think I'll wait to see what he has to say. Thanks all the same.
Well @BCP1928 said he has evidence of an advanced civilization, so I think I'll wait to see what he has to say. Thanks all the same.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?