Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What a waste of resources, lol.
You have not addressed the issue. Which part of "Sam's" statements are factually incorrect?That's a bit rich! You post a dialogue without any hint of the source and then you have the temerity to attack a fellow member when they confess to being confused. Some up front honesty from you in providing source and relevant context could have avoided that. I am disappointed, but sadly not surprised.
Now to the meat of the matter. Anecdotes are great to relate over a beer with friends; they can add a bit of colour to an otherwise drab discussion; however, they are not especially effective at providing convincing evidence to challenge a position arrived at by extensive and diverse research. If you had not an anecdote, but a rigorously constructed poll that showed a significant proportion of the relevant scientific community echoed the sentiments expressed in your anecdote, then it would be worth sitting up and taking notice. Without that you just have an anecdote.
Do you believe that it is impossible for a scientist to be ignorant of every discipline but his own specialisation? I do not.Tour is not a molecular biologist. He is a synthetic organic chemist specializing in molecular machines. They are not the same thing. The "scientist" quoted in that article is not James Tour, so he is irrelevant.
Do you believe that it is impossible for a scientist to be ignorant of every discipline but his own specialisation? I do not.
I shall be happy to do so once you have apologised for your gross discourtesy to @sfs and acknowledged that your posting of a sizeable chunk of text without properly citing it is boderline plagiarism.You have not addressed the issue. Which part of "Sam's" statements are factually incorrect?
If, IF ToE were false, the disproofDo you believe that it is impossible for a scientist to be ignorant of every discipline but his own specialisation? I do not.
What does that have to do with your claim that Tour was a leader in the field? He's not a leader in the field of the molecular basis of disease.Do you believe that it is impossible for a scientist to be ignorant of every discipline but his own specialisation? I do not.
The few scientists who don't acceptWhat does that have to do with your claim that Tour was a leader in the field? He's not a leader in the field of the molecular basis of disease.
I bet $1.79 USD that neither point will be conceded.Tour is not a molecular biologist. He is a synthetic organic chemist specializing in molecular machines. They are not the same thing. The "scientist" quoted in that article is not James Tour, so he is irrelevant.
Darwinism is a false narrative, this can be clearly seen by reading Genesis 6.
Except God's own creation says otherwise...
Now you sound like Lamberth.
Are you in communication with God's own creation?
If so, is it telling you the Bible is wrong?
Question in response: If God did create the world, why would He make it one way and yet allow a book to be written that says He did an entirely different way to the world He has us inhabit?
God didn't allow the creation of the Nephilim, this is what the deluge was for, to rid the earth of them.
Which means that the Flood failed since the Nephilim are still around afterwards (Numbers 13:33).God didn't allow the creation of the Nephilim, this is what the deluge was for, to rid the earth of them.
He uses two terms he does not define: "information" and "design." Without those definitions, his statements are impossible to analyze, since both terms have a variety of meanings depending on the context. In particular, as used in scientific discourse, "information" is a mathematical concept. Without a specific mathematical definition his assertions are vacuous.You have not addressed the issue. Which part of "Sam's" statements are factually incorrect?
What the Earth itSelf as Created by God with His own hands is showing us paints a very different picture than does the ancient creation story of a nomadic tribe of desert nomads.Darwinism is a false narrative, this can be clearly seen by reading Genesis 6.
Yes.Are you in communication with God's own creation?
If so, is it telling you the Bible is wrong?
This sounds to me very much like a Greek/Roman Pagan type of God sitting high up in a cloud somewhere dishing out punishment.God didn't allow the creation of the Nephilim, this is what the deluge was for, to rid the earth of them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?