Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You dodged the " increase in order"Atomic structure has order, and can be mathematically predicted, thus everything above that also has order, or can be mathematically predicted/proven (as having order, etc) although we are still a long, long way off from that, etc.
God Bless.
There is a world of mystics?I wouldn't expect anything less. Your not of the world of mystics which I referenced.
I didn't come here to fight, etc.Dodge city
I just call that simpler order, or order that humans can more easily see/comprehend, etc.You dodged the " increase in order"
Never mind. I see you cannot do it.I just call that simpler order, or order that humans can more easily comprehend, etc.
God Bless.
Well, I'm so very, very glad you are so virtuous, and have so much integrity, etc.Never mind. I see you cannot do it.
But as for me, if one of the bases fot
something i believe is demonstrably false,
I don't make excuses,I don't lie to myself,
I don't invent new definitions to make the
false look true or any of that.
It's called intellectual integrity.
Too bad your book left out mention of
integrity as a value
How are ID and creationism mutually exclusive?
It took about 350 million years from the first tetrapods to the first apes.Not immediately at least. It takes trillions of years. I get it.
So the fact that the elders disagreed on the type of tree under which they said they saw Susannah having sex with her lover doesn't prove that their story was false and that Susannah was innocent.On the details, yes. After all, did the rooster crow once, or twice. As Josh McDowell said in his book, one of the reasons he believed the gospels is because they were NOT in lockstep agreement. Being a trial attorney he said that one way you can tell witnesses conspired to lie is when the testimony is identical from all of them. Real witnesses to an event never agree on everything. That's how you know the event really happened. But disagreement on details doesn't mean the event itself didn't happen.
I don't invent new definitions to make the false look true or any of that.
No, they didn't.
According to The moon may be 40 million years older than we thought, Apollo 17 samples suggest , U-Pb dating of zircons from Apollo 17 rock samples has yielded an age of 4.46 billion years. Since the Moon was formed as a result of a collision between the Earth and another planet, the Earth must be at least 4.46 billion years old; by any standard this is near to 4.5 billion years. What makes you think otherwise?The moon says that the earth is nowhere near 4.5 billion years. So does the ocean floor and erosion of the shoreline. If only rocks really could talk.
Nothing objectively true about Pluto was changed.Yes, they did.
From Merriam-Webster:
In 2006 the International Astronomical Union defined planet in such a way as to exclude Pluto, reclassifying it instead as a dwarf planet. Although discussion of the matter continues, the change has been widely accepted.
SOURCE
Nothing objectively true about Pluto was changed.
It's way past time to stop indulging this pluto nonsenseNothing objectively true about Pluto was changed.
It's way past time to stop indulging this pluto nonsense.
What a waste of resources, lol.You might want to stay away from California, New Mexico, and Illinois then.
Especially New Mexico and Illinois.
Public reception to the IAU decision was mixed. A resolution introduced in the California State Assembly facetiously called the IAU decision a "scientific heresy". The New Mexico House of Representatives passed a resolution in honor of Clyde Tombaugh, the discoverer of Pluto and a longtime resident of that state, that declared that Pluto will always be considered a planet while in New Mexican skies and that March 13, 2007 was Pluto Planet Day. The Illinois Senate passed a similar resolution in 2009 on the basis that Tombaugh was born in Illinois. The resolution asserted that Pluto was "unfairly downgraded to a 'dwarf' planet" by the IAU."
SOURCE
But I guess Pluto has fallen victim to the theory of planetary evolution, hasn't it?
You are indeed confused. And indulging in an ad hominem attack to boot. I expect nothing else from the pro evolutionist community. It is a real interview of a real person by a real writer. What the molecular biologist said is not unique. Professor James Tour, one of the leaders in the field, tells his students not to mention that they disbelieve in evolution - if they wish to pursue a career in science.
If you wish to refute the arguments, why not address them instead of using leading rhetorical questions? Perhaps that's only argument that you have?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?