Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Facts for evolutionists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DJ_Ghost" data-source="post: 48443853" data-attributes="member: 30595"><p>We dont re-create the crime either. The way we interrogate evidence at a crime scene and the way we interrogate evidence for evolution are very similar.</p><p></p><p>Any action leaves behind evidence, and we examine that evidence. Evolution leaves behind considerably more evidence than just the fossil record. ERVs for example, amongst others. It is becase all of the strings of evidence point the same way that we accept evolution.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont agree that abiogenesis does not hold water, I find it a very plausible and well supported theory. Dont get me wrong, I am a theist who believes in a God, but I am perfectly willing to be wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have conducted yourself very well, give how little support you have received from other creationists and how many opposing points you have had to try and wade through.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough, perhaps dishonest was too strong a term, I will settle for mistaken in your earlier statement that all Christians are creationists rather than dishonest about it, because you are right, dishonest was an unfair assumption on my part.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that is a misunderstanding of what Catholics do in venerating Virgin and the apostles. Remember that the Catholic church convened and presided over the council of Nicea, so they hardly violate its creed, they are in large part, responsible for it.</p><p></p><p>Ghost</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DJ_Ghost, post: 48443853, member: 30595"] We dont re-create the crime either. The way we interrogate evidence at a crime scene and the way we interrogate evidence for evolution are very similar. Any action leaves behind evidence, and we examine that evidence. Evolution leaves behind considerably more evidence than just the fossil record. ERVs for example, amongst others. It is becase all of the strings of evidence point the same way that we accept evolution. I dont agree that abiogenesis does not hold water, I find it a very plausible and well supported theory. Dont get me wrong, I am a theist who believes in a God, but I am perfectly willing to be wrong. You have conducted yourself very well, give how little support you have received from other creationists and how many opposing points you have had to try and wade through. Fair enough, perhaps dishonest was too strong a term, I will settle for mistaken in your earlier statement that all Christians are creationists rather than dishonest about it, because you are right, dishonest was an unfair assumption on my part. I think that is a misunderstanding of what Catholics do in venerating Virgin and the apostles. Remember that the Catholic church convened and presided over the council of Nicea, so they hardly violate its creed, they are in large part, responsible for it. Ghost [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Facts for evolutionists
Top
Bottom