Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Factory Mixup ruins 15 million Covid-19 vaccine doses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trunks2k" data-source="post: 75927249" data-attributes="member: 24431"><p>It should also be noted:</p><p></p><p>The VICP also protects consumers. The burden of proof is much lower than civil court. If your condition fits the injury table for the given vaccine, you get compensated. You, as a consumer, don't have to prove that vaccine is what caused your injury; the court just assumes that it did.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, consumers can still sue the vaccine makers in normal civil court if the court doesn't find in their favor. It's just that now it's going to be a more difficult suit.</p><p></p><p>So the court protects both consumers AND manufacturers. It protects manufacturers from having to spend a lot of money on fighting (potentially frivolous) lawsuits and on the flip side, protects consumers from having to shell out a bunch in legal fees to get compensated for an injury that can be very difficult to prove. </p><p></p><p>End result is manufacturers are will continue making vaccines, which are not very profitable so high legal costs are a deterrent; and people feel more comfortable getting vaccinated because they have a better chance of getting compensated if they feel they were injured by the vaccine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trunks2k, post: 75927249, member: 24431"] It should also be noted: The VICP also protects consumers. The burden of proof is much lower than civil court. If your condition fits the injury table for the given vaccine, you get compensated. You, as a consumer, don't have to prove that vaccine is what caused your injury; the court just assumes that it did. Additionally, consumers can still sue the vaccine makers in normal civil court if the court doesn't find in their favor. It's just that now it's going to be a more difficult suit. So the court protects both consumers AND manufacturers. It protects manufacturers from having to spend a lot of money on fighting (potentially frivolous) lawsuits and on the flip side, protects consumers from having to shell out a bunch in legal fees to get compensated for an injury that can be very difficult to prove. End result is manufacturers are will continue making vaccines, which are not very profitable so high legal costs are a deterrent; and people feel more comfortable getting vaccinated because they have a better chance of getting compensated if they feel they were injured by the vaccine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Factory Mixup ruins 15 million Covid-19 vaccine doses
Top
Bottom