• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Status
Not open for further replies.

drmmjr

Regular Member
Feb 5, 2002
459
7
Visit site
✟867.00
Faith
Christian

Yeah, don't you just love a challange. But I won't be so presumptuous as to mention that the bulk of these meanings relate to something being made. When something is "caused to be", is it not caused to come into being, or caused to be made?


If you will look at John 1:14 in KJV, you will see "ginomai" in the second Aorist tense, middle deponent voice, and indicative mood translated as "made".
John 1:14 - And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.




If God didn't speak the word, then how was the word made flesh?
 
Upvote 0

xsimmsx

A New Creature
Nov 4, 2003
246
1
46
Philadelphia
✟22,891.00
Faith
Christian


That isn't true the bible says that we have One Lord and his name is Jesus Christ. The Bible says that we have One Spirit that we all know as the Holy Spirit. The Bible also says that that One Spirit is God. Jesus refers to that Spirit as his Father. The Bible also lets us know that that One Spirit is that One Lord who just so happens to be Jesus.

Meaning Jesus is the Father The Son and The Holy Ghost. Oh and there is not three as you presume for the bible says that these three are One. So if they are One then they are the same and if the Same then they are One. Period. The distinctions are the roles fulfilled and the difference between human and God, flesh and Spirit. which we know as Son and Father.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
drmmjr said:
Yeah, don't you just love a challange. But I won't be so presumptuous as to mention that the bulk of these meanings relate to something being made. When something is "caused to be", is it not caused to come into being, or caused to be made?

"the Bulk of these meanings relate to something being made.” Is that a fact? Here is the quote again. I have highlighted the only two definitions, out of over 40, that relate to something being made.

A prolonged and middle form of a primary verb; to cause to be (“gen” -erate), that is, (reflexively) to become (come into being), used with great latitude (literally, figuratively, intensively, etc.): - arise be assembled, be (come, -fall, -have self), be brought (to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be divided, be done, draw, be ended, fall, be finished, follow, be found, be fulfilled, + God forbid, grow, happen, have, be kept, be made, be married, be ordained to be, partake, pass, be performed, be published, require, seem, be showed, X soon as it was, sound, be taken, be turned, use, wax, will, would, be wrought.
” When something is "caused to be", is it not caused to come into being, or caused to be made?” Are you asking me or telling me? Read the definitions yourself. For example, “[cause to be] be married”, “[cause to be] be ordained”, “[cause to be] be performed”, “[cause to be] be published,” “[cause to be] be showed,” etc. The answer is no.

Posted previously:
Therefore, since you presume to challenge that translation and the documentation I provided, please provide us with documentation that the word "ginomai" in the second Aorist tense, middle deponent voice, and indicative mood, egeneto/egeneto, as in Jn 1:14, is ever translated, "made," in the N.T., and explain why that translation is more correct than that which I posted. Can we expect that any time soon?



Oh I’m sorry, do we not understand? I showed documentation why this translation is not correct. Do you have any other examples? I thought not. And OBTW, you evidently do not have a clue what “second Aorist tense, middle deponent voice, and indicative mood” means or you would not have posted this nonsense. And do please insult everyone’s intelligence by trying to imply I was talking about John 1:14.

Previously posted:

”And, yes, the Logos is the doer of the action. God spoke the word (Logos), and it happened." Nice try, but no matter how you wiggle, twist and add to the scripture, in your statement, God is the doer. John 1:14 does NOT say, "God spoke the word and etc.." It says, "The Logos, [acting upon himself] became flesh.


If God didn't speak the word, then how was the word made flesh?

And we apparently, still do not understand. I will quote John 1:1 & 14. Please show us where it states, “God spoke the word and etc.

Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
As I have said on several occasions, when the Jews translated the O.T. into Aramaic, during the Babylonian captivity, ca. 700 BC, they substituted the Aramaic word for, “word,” i.e. “Memra” for God. So for the Jews, God was literally the Word and the Word was literally God. Exactly As John said, John did not invent this, it was nothing new for the Jews. Here are over 65 examples, out of many, many more.

Jewish Encyclopedia-Memra-In the Targum:

In the Targum the Memra figures constantly as the manifestation of the divine power, or as God's messenger in place of God Himself, wherever the predicate is not in conformity with the dignity or the spirituality of the Deity.

Instead of the Scriptural "You have not believed in the Lord," Targ. Deut. i. 32 has "You have not believed in the word of the Lord"; instead of "I shall require it [vengeance] from him," Targ. Deut. xviii. 19 has "My word shall require it." "The Memra," instead of "the Lord," is "the consuming fire" (Targ. Deut. ix. 3; comp. Targ. Isa. xxx. 27). The Memra "plagued the people" (Targ. Yer. to Ex. xxxii. 35). "The Memra smote him" (II Sam. vi. 7; comp. Targ. I Kings xviii. 24; Hos. xiii. 14; et al.). Not "God," but "the Memra," is met with in Targ. Ex. xix. 17 (Targ. Yer. "the Shekinah"; comp. Targ. Ex. xxv. 22: "I will order My Memra to be there"). "I will cover thee with My Memra," instead of "My hand" (Targ. Ex. xxxiii. 22). Instead of "My soul," "My Memra shall reject you" (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 30; comp. Isa. i. 14, xlii. 1; Jer. vi. 8; Ezek. xxiii. 18). "The voice of the Memra," instead of "God," is heard (Gen. iii. 8; Deut. iv. 33, 36; v. 21; Isa. vi. 8; et al.). Where Moses says, "I stood between the Lord and you" (Deut. v. 5), the Targum has, "between the Memra of the Lord and you"; and the "sign between Me and you" becomes a "sign between My Memra and you" (Ex. xxxi. 13, 17; comp. Lev. xxvi. 46; Gen. ix. 12; xvii. 2, 7, 10; Ezek. xx. 12). Instead of God, the Memra comes to Abimelek (Gen. xx. 3), and to Balaam (Num. xxiii. 4). His Memra aids and accompanies Israel, performing wonders for them (Targ. Num. xxiii. 21; Deut. i. 30, xxxiii. 3; Targ. Isa. lxiii. 14; Jer. xxxi. 1; Hos. ix. 10 [comp. xi. 3, "the messenger-angel"]). The Memra goes before Cyrus (Isa. xlv. 12). The Lord swears by His Memra (Gen. xxi. 23, xxii. 16, xxiv. 3; Ex. xxxii. 13; Num. xiv. 30; Isa. xlv. 23; Ezek. xx. 5; et al.). It is His Memra that repents (Targ. Gen. vi. 6, viii. 21; I Sam. xv. 11, 35). Not His "hand," but His "Memra has laid the foundation of the earth" (Targ. Isa. xlviii. 13); for His Memra's or Name's sake does He act (l.c. xlviii. 11; II Kings xix. 34). Through the Memra God turns to His people (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 90; II Kings xiii. 23), becomes the shield of Abraham (Gen. xv. 1), and is with Moses (Ex. iii. 12; iv. 12, 15) and with Israel (Targ. Yer. to Num. x. 35, 36; Isa. lxiii. 14). It is the Memra, not God Himself, against whom man offends (Ex. xvi. 8; Num. xiv. 5; I Kings viii. 50; II Kings xix. 28; Isa. i. 2, 16; xlv. 3, 20; Hos. v. 7, vi. 7; Targ. Yer. to Lev. v. 21, vi. 2; Deut. v. 11); through His Memra Israel shall be justified (Targ. Isa. xlv. 25); with the Memra Israel stands in communion (Targ. Josh. xxii. 24, 27); in the Memra man puts his trust (Targ. Gen. xv. 6; Targ. Yer. to Ex. xiv. 31; Jer. xxxix. 18, xlix. 11).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=399&letter=M
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
xsimmsx said:
That isn't true the bible says that we have One Lord and his name is Jesus Christ.

Where?

The Bible says that we have One Spirit that we all know as the Holy Spirit.

Where?

The Bible also says that that One Spirit is God.

Where?

Jesus refers to that Spirit as his Father.

Where?

The Bible also lets us know that that One Spirit is that One Lord who just so happens to be Jesus.

Where?

Meaning Jesus is the Father The Son and The Holy Ghost.

False!

Oh and there is not three as you presume for the bible says that these three are One. So if they are One then they are the same and if the Same then they are One. Period.

Where does the Bible say they are the same?

The distinctions are the roles fulfilled and the difference between human and God, flesh and Spirit. which we know as Son and Father.

False! There is no place in the scripture where it states that Father, Son, and Spirit are "roles fufilled" by God.

As I have already proven from Exodus 3:14, God's name is YHWH and this is His name forever and a memorial to all generations. Therefore God's name cannot be Jesus!
 
Upvote 0

ZoneChaos

Senior Veteran
Feb 5, 2002
3,972
24
49
Kansas City, MO
Visit site
✟30,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
xsimmsx said:
That isn't true the bible says that we have One Lord and his name is Jesus Christ.
Nothing I said above shows other wise. I accept that we only have one Lord, Jesus Christ, as does the trinity Doctrine. What part of the Doctrine says we do not have one Lord?

The Bible says that we have One Spirit that we all know as the Holy Spirit.
Same as above.. I agree there is One Spirit.

The Bible also says that that One Spirit is God.
I said that in the post you are replying to...

Jesus refers to that Spirit as his Father. The Bible also lets us know that that One Spirit is that One Lord who just so happens to be Jesus.

Meaning Jesus is the Father The Son and The Holy Ghost.
Umm... So you are saying that there are 3 (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) in one (Jesus). So, why is it so hard for you to say 3 (FSH) in 1 (God)??? Plus, there are verses that have Jesus and the Spirit as seperate entities, interecting.

Oh and there is not three as you presume for the bible says that these three are One.
Umm.. there are three AND these three are one. I can show you verses that show that each has a seperate will, and seperate natures, and also are the same one God.

So if they are One then they are the same and if the Same then they are One. Period.
"One" does not mean "same" in this case.

The distinctions are the roles fulfilled
Don't you mean "role" since you are referring to a singular entitiy fulfilling these "roles"? DOn't get me wring, I am happy with "roles" so long as we have the Father, Son and SPirit with thier own "role".

and the difference between human and God, flesh and Spirit. which we know as Son and Father.
Wait.. so now there are 2 roles: Son and Father... and also, both of these roles, which are really one role, are also the Spirit? Got scripture?
 
Upvote 0

ZoneChaos

Senior Veteran
Feb 5, 2002
3,972
24
49
Kansas City, MO
Visit site
✟30,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
xsimmsx said:
Distinctions yes. Persons No.
How do you define "destinction" as opposed to "person"? What are the differences that one has that the other does not that lead you to choose one over the other?
 
Upvote 0

xsimmsx

A New Creature
Nov 4, 2003
246
1
46
Philadelphia
✟22,891.00
Faith
Christian
ZoneChaos said:
How do you define "destinction" as opposed to "person"? What are the differences that one has that the other does not that lead you to choose one over the other?


The scripture's emphasis on the absolute Oneness of God in relation to personalities. Which trinitarians call person's.

Specifically my brother Job's understanding. And he went through a lot

Job 13:1-10
See, my eye has seen all this, my ear has heard and understood it. What you know, the same do I know also: I am not inferior to you. Surely I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to reason with God. But you are forgers of lies, you are all physicians of no value. O that you would altogether hold your peace! and it should be your wisdom. HEAR NOW MY REASONING, and listen to the pleadings of my lips. Will you speak wickedly for God? and talk deceitfully for him? Will you ACCEPT HIS PERSON? will you contend for God? Is it good that he should search you out? or as one man mocks another, do you so mock him? He will surely reprove you, if you do secretly ACCEPT PERSONS.


In Jesus Name,
Joshua
 
Upvote 0

ZoneChaos

Senior Veteran
Feb 5, 2002
3,972
24
49
Kansas City, MO
Visit site
✟30,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ok.. that didn't really answer my question... let me see if I can better expllain what I am after...

Can you list the differences that you see between "disticntion" and "person"?

Example:

To me a distiction of the "roles" of God would be a percieved characteristic that differs from on distinction to another: ie Jesus and the Spirit, whereas persons would have a definate characteristic difference.

Let me list for you some characteristics of "The Father", "The Son" and "The Spirit" and you tell me, wether they would generally be used to mark a difference of persons or a disticntion of one person:

In Luke 22:42 we see the Son apparently speaking to the Father:

"Not my will, but thine be done." We have 2 wills here. Is having mor than one will, wills that oppose, mark seperate distinctions of the same person or does it mark 2 persons?

Also, We have scripture of the Holy Spirit as not just having a will, but having one and being noted as being seperate from Jesus:

I Cor. 12:3 "..and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost." Spirit seperate from Jesus"

I Cor 12:11 "...that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as He will."

So, are there 3 wills in play here? or the same will, percieved as different wills becasue we are percieving different distinctions? And if the latter, then why do they seem to have their own agenda, if they are infact the same will?

In essence, the Trinity Doctrine states that there is one God, not three, and that the one God exists in three (inseret favorite word here).

But, when inserting that word, make sure it does not contradict statements made about God in scripture.

I choose the word "person" because a person is self aware, can speak, love, hate, say "you," "yours," "me," "mine," etc. Each of the three "persons" in the Trinity demonstrate these qualities. We could say that each of the "distinctions" of God demonstrate these same qualities. But then, wouoldn't that be the "same difference" so to speak?
 
Upvote 0

xsimmsx

A New Creature
Nov 4, 2003
246
1
46
Philadelphia
✟22,891.00
Faith
Christian


No we couldn't and still be true to the number One. you see if God is divided into three persons then he is not One but he is three. You will not see a distinction as you have worded it between Holy Spirit and the Father because there is none. The distinction that you will see is always between father and son.

In other words God and man.
or In other words Spirit and flesh.
Notice what you said in I Corinthians 12:11..... see how it says selfsame spirit

That means he is his own self meaning if he is the only Spirit then you can't have another spirit or it is not him. Jesus describes his Father as a Spirit. We know him as God the Father we also know him as the Holy Spirit. There is no distinction between the two because there is not two there is only One Spirit and he is holy and he is our Father. "Holy Spirit" and "Father" are just titles that we use to describe the same exact being. that eliminates a trinity of persons. Jesus also claims to be this Spirit at times and to be this Spirit's Son at others. And he was both as soon as he was born. The 2 wills deasl with his human will and his Divine will. He had a will as a man and he had a will as God. Much in the same way that we have two wills warring against one another inside our members. The difference with Jesus is that he didn't have the war of wills because he was without sin. But he still had the human tendencies of a human's will. Check out his prayers in the Garden of Gethsemane notice Jesus words......

Matthew 26:36-42
36Then comes Jesus with them to a place called Gethsemane, and said to the disciples, Sit you here, while I go and pray yonder. 37And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. 38Then said he to them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even to death: tarry you here, and watch with me. 39And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as you will. 40And he comes to the disciples, and finds them asleep, and said to Peter, What, could you not watch with me one hour? 41Watch and pray, that you enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. 42He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, your will be done.


Look first at verse 38. Jesus says "My soul is exceeding sorrowful..."
Here Jesus is describing his human attribute being sorroful notice that he doesn't mention a spiritual sorrow. That's because the Spirit in him was not sorrowful. Oh but his flesh was. Look at verse 41 "The Spirit indeed is willing"
God was willing able and ready. "but the flesh is weak" However the human body was like O NO not death!!!. --obviously my words here to show the teaching. The human Son always prayed to the divine Father. It was a real relationship and a real need but it was not a seperation of persons.

Furthermore the Son became Spirit when he was glorified. So he is what he has always been divinely our Father and he now has a human identity with which to identify with us. Jesus Christ our Savior. For it is written in the scripture of truth....

II Corinthians 3:17:
Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

No seperation of person's there. Your One Lord Jesus Christ is that Spirit that One Spirit we call the Holy Spirit. God our Father.

Praise God

Joshua
 
Upvote 0

ZoneChaos

Senior Veteran
Feb 5, 2002
3,972
24
49
Kansas City, MO
Visit site
✟30,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
xsimmsx said:
No we couldn't and still be true to the number One. you see if God is divided into three persons then he is not One but he is three.
And some beleive that.. I do not, I guess I use different terminology than you, but I accept that 1+1+1=1 not 3. 1+1+1 being the 3 (insert word here) of the Bible mentioned: Father, Son, Spirit. They each are defined, and have characteristics that vary, but they are all One God. They are "seperate because they have "personal" characteristics when depicted in scripture...when their "titles" are used: Father, Son, and Spirit.

You will not see a distinction as you have worded it between Holy Spirit and the Father because there is none.
I am not sure what you are referring to. In my example you repsonded to, I said Father and Son.

The distinction that you will see is always between father and son.

In other words God and man.
or In other words Spirit and flesh.
When you say "God and man" above, are referring to mankind in general when you use the word "man"? If so, then lets just talk about God.. leave us out of it, since we are not God, thus not part of the topic on the Trinity Doctrine.

Or, are are you referrign to the "Son" when you say man? If so, then I can follow you in making a distinction between Father and Son, so long as we agree that the Father is God and the Son is God.

Notice what you said in I Corinthians 12:11.....see how it says selfsame spirit

That means he is his own self meaning
Can you show me how you arrived at this?

From my understanding, the word "Selfsame" in the text is translated form the greek word autos, which is a pronoun which in by itself signifies nothing more than "again" applies to what has already been mention in the past. Also, in some cases when the entire discouse is looked at it can signify somethig that must be applied.

if he is the only Spirit then you can't have another spirit or it is not him.
I never said there was more than one "Spirit" of God. There is only one: The Holy Spirit.

Jesus describes his Father as a Spirit.
Scripture?

We know him as God the Father we also know him as the Holy Spirit.
Hmm.. by "him" you mean "God" or "Father"? I know God as the Holy Spirit, as well as Father, but I do not know the Father as the Holy Spirit.

Why Woulde John say that there are 3 who testify in Heaven, if there is only one who testifys?


II Corinthians 3:17:
Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

No seperation of person's there. Your One Lord Jesus Christ is that Spirit that One Spirit we call the Holy Spirit. God our Father.[/quote]
If "Lord" in that verse is directly referencing Jesus Christ, then perahps what you say is correct, however, in context with Exodus 34:34, we see that the object being called Lord is not Jesus Christ (the man who Paul new), but it is God (as the poeple knew God to be at the time of Moses.

Paul is further supporting the Fact that the Holy Spirit is God in this verse. Thre verse is not directly tlaking about the Son. The passage is about the holy Spirit, and the verse is linking and validating the holy Spirit of the New Covanent, with the God of Moses and Abraham in the Old Covanent.
 
Upvote 0

True Believer

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2003
1,393
12
California
✟1,647.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Der Alter said:
Where?





As I have already proven from Exodus 3:14, God's name is YHWH and this is His name forever and a memorial to all generations. Therefore God's name cannot be Jesus!
This is what I have been saying all along and been told by you I am Wrong.
YHWH is GOD= Greater
Jesus is the Son = lesser
Not same!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Congratulations!!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
True Believer said:
This is what I have been saying all along and been told by you I am Wrong.
YHWH is GOD= Greater
Jesus is the Son = lesser
Not same!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Congratulations!!!!!!!

This is so typical of people with an unorthodox mindset. You take one sentence out-of-context and assume that represents someone's complete Theology/Christology. I was addressing one specific false doctrine. I have no idea what you are doing all the claps, and congratulations for because The Son IS God. The Father IS God. The Holy Spirit IS God. But the The Son is NOT the Father is NOT the Holy Spirit is NOT the Son, etc.

I have never said differently and do NOT say so now. For a time Jesus chose not to grasp His equality with God but humbled Himself, emptied Himself and became a servant, a man and, He prayed in the garden that the Father restore Him to the glory He had with the Father from before the foundation of the world.

Click on thumbnail
↙ for larger picture, showing scripture references.


_______________________________________
Acknowledge that ALL True Christians will be Arminian in glory. . . .
 
Upvote 0

xsimmsx

A New Creature
Nov 4, 2003
246
1
46
Philadelphia
✟22,891.00
Faith
Christian
If "Lord" in that verse is directly referencing Jesus Christ, then perahps what you say is correct, however, in context with Exodus 34:34, we see that the object being called Lord is not Jesus Christ (the man who Paul new), but it is God (as the poeple knew God to be at the time of Moses.

Paul is further supporting the Fact that the Holy Spirit is God in this verse. Thre verse is not directly tlaking about the Son. The passage is about the holy Spirit, and the verse is linking and validating the holy Spirit of the New Covanent, with the God of Moses and Abraham in the Old Covanent.[/QUOTE]

Your not listening. Who is the One Lord the Holy Spirit or Jesus?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Talyn said:
Where did the concept of the trinity first come from? If this question has already been asked, then sorry. I suppose i really should read the whole thread.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

1 Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

Gal 4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.

Eph 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
Eph 2:18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

Rom 1:4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

Eph 1:17 That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:

Luk 3:21 Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,
Luk 3:22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, [the Father] which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.

_______________________________________
Acknowledge that ALL True Christians will be Arminian in glory. . . .
 
Upvote 0

Breetai

For I am not ashamed of the Gospel...
Dec 3, 2003
13,939
396
✟38,820.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If Der Alter's post doesn't convince someone of the trinity, then they are either blind or they can't read.

1 John 5:7 says it so clear. The trinity is very clearly taught in the Bible. If you believe the Bible, then you can't deny that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are ONE.
 
Upvote 0
V

Valid Name

Guest
Greetings All!

I must say, that I would have no problem with saying that The Father, Holy Spirit, and Son are ONE!

The Problem is when this logic begins to be changed!

We are given a clear definition of what 'one' is, and what it can mean. Messiah tells us that HE is in US, and WE are in HIM, just as The Father is IN HIM and he is IN The Father!

No one would dare claim that we are The Father! Now how in light of scripture like this, can the word ONE be used as a text for the 'trinity?'

Peace,
Valid Name
 
Upvote 0

xsimmsx

A New Creature
Nov 4, 2003
246
1
46
Philadelphia
✟22,891.00
Faith
Christian

Your not listening. Who is the One Lord the Holy Spirit or Jesus?[/QUOTE]


I Corinthians 8:6:
But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.

Ephesians 4:3-6
3Endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4There is one body, and one Spirit, even as you are called in one hope of your calling; 5One Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.


According to Paul there is only one body of Christ. In Context of the verse He also says there is only One Lord and only One Spirit and only One God who is the Father. THe definition of the number One in these verses is absolute it is not a unity or a trinity or an infinity. It is the number One. Single. Alone. By himself. Paul referenced Lord he was referencing Jesus period. using simple logic and not theological garbage you can obviously see that when Jesus is referenced as God it means the Father for there is no God but the Father. According to the Apostle Paul's definition. Remember we are to believe on the Apostle's words because Jesus said So.


I Corinthians 12:3:
Why I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.


It takes the Holy Ghost to let you know that Jesus is Lord and God.
Other Words it takes Jesus to let you know that Jesus is Lord and God because reall it isn't about you it's about Jesus.

In Truth,
Joshua
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.