Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionist Caught Lying for Their Religion- Fossils
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="USincognito" data-source="post: 73154863" data-attributes="member: 21511"><p>Variations of this assertion are tossed about by Creationists, but they never support their claims. Looking at Google Scholar for papers published between 1912 and 1960 there's only ~200 hits. Most of those are mere mentions of E. Dawsoni in a list of other fossils. Those that are actual papers are concentrated between 1913 and 1918. There are some papers that are questioning the find in there as well. These results hardly support the contention that this specimen was claimed to have "proved" evolution. </p><p></p><p>By the way, science doesn't prove anything and there's no such thing as scientific proof so it's best to try and exercise that particular verbiage from the discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is not a fact. That is a falsehood. H. Haroldcookii was never in museums or textbooks. That is simply untrue. The tooth wasn't examined by "leading authorities from 26 institutions across Europe and the US" who "classified it as a missing link". That is simply untrue as well. </p><p></p><p>These supposed lies by "evolutionists" are quite humorous given the amount of falsehoods being told about them by Creationists, the fact that they're from 100 years ago and how Creationists ignore the many actual and correctly identified fossils like Java man (H. erectus), Taung Child, The First Family, Little Foot, Turkana Boy, Lucy, Selam, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="USincognito, post: 73154863, member: 21511"] Variations of this assertion are tossed about by Creationists, but they never support their claims. Looking at Google Scholar for papers published between 1912 and 1960 there's only ~200 hits. Most of those are mere mentions of E. Dawsoni in a list of other fossils. Those that are actual papers are concentrated between 1913 and 1918. There are some papers that are questioning the find in there as well. These results hardly support the contention that this specimen was claimed to have "proved" evolution. By the way, science doesn't prove anything and there's no such thing as scientific proof so it's best to try and exercise that particular verbiage from the discussion. That is not a fact. That is a falsehood. H. Haroldcookii was never in museums or textbooks. That is simply untrue. The tooth wasn't examined by "leading authorities from 26 institutions across Europe and the US" who "classified it as a missing link". That is simply untrue as well. These supposed lies by "evolutionists" are quite humorous given the amount of falsehoods being told about them by Creationists, the fact that they're from 100 years ago and how Creationists ignore the many actual and correctly identified fossils like Java man (H. erectus), Taung Child, The First Family, Little Foot, Turkana Boy, Lucy, Selam, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionist Caught Lying for Their Religion- Fossils
Top
Bottom