Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry, I fixed the link. Didn't realize it was case sensitive.
w ww.call2christ.org/OnEvolution.html
remove the space between the first two w's.
·Plant and animal life as far as earth’s atmosphere is involved is symbiotic. So which one held it’s breath for millions of years until one evolved enough to support the other?
There's a lot wrong in that page.Sorry, I fixed the link. Didn't realize it was case sensitive.
w ww.call2christ.org/OnEvolution.html
remove the space between the first two w's.
Sexual reproduction is a very effective way of promoting genetic diversity within a population. If you look at a population if bacteria, they are all nearly identical so a disease could wipe them all out. in a sexual population, there would be enough of a distribution of genes that it is m ore likely that there would enough survivors to sustain the population. asking how sexes evolved is a legitimite question, it is not fatal to evolution though. Since almost all animals are sexual, the differentiation goes way way back.Why are there 2 sexes?
As long as enough of the population lacks birth defects, the population will not be adversely affected by it. that observation is obviously absurd.Birth defects take place at a much faster rate than anything that can be attributed to evolution. It is obviously observable that life is breaking down, not evolving.
If you think we are wrong about how the sun works there are two towns in Japan you ought to visit.The sun shrinks by 5 miles every year which means as early as 20 million years ago its diameter would have encompassed the earth. The theory to negate this is that the internal explosions in the sun push its diameter outward while the gravity of the sun pulls its diameter inward creating a stable diameter.
It's called coevolution. what happens is that when species are symbiotic and one of them speciates the other species also speciates. You can, and this has been done, make up cladograms for two groups of symbiotic taxa and lay them on top of one another and they match.Plant and animal life as far as earth’s atmosphere is involved is symbiotic. So which one held it’s breath for millions of years until one evolved enough to support the other?
The fossil record shows exactly the opposite. Life today is magnitudes more complex than in the Mesoproterozoic (1.2 billion years ago) for example, where the biggest and most advanced organisms were simple cell colonies.· Birth defects take place at a much faster rate than anything that can be attributed to evolution. It is obviously observable that life is breaking down, not evolving.
Nothing is more humorous than when an evolutionist pokes fun at creationists or IDists for not putting forth a scientific theory to explain life.
First of all, life is not scientific -- life is spirtual. Contrary to what evolutionists say, what makes us human is not the shape of our jaw bone or the size of our heads. Life is something that controls and manipulates the matter it occupies. Thus, those who claim to be able to describe life scientifically are kidding themselves because life is more than material -- it's metaphysical, which by defintion is in conflict with science. Science is the study of the material world.
So when evolutionists scoff at Creationists for not putting forth a scientific theory for life, I believe they are asking us to play a game, which includes defining life according to a flawed premise.
But what's truly laughable about all this is that the "science" evolutionists put forth is not science at all. Like I said, "science" is (or should be) the study of the material world. But what the world's evolutionists have forced down our kids' throats is not science. Instead it's long list of "what ifs," "probablys," "maybes," and "more-than-likelys." What they're attempting to sell the unsuspecting public is not to be found in nature -- it's found in their books.
And their so-called evidence is NEVER visible. Never. For example, every creature on earth is said to have evolved from a common ancestor. Thus there must, be thousands and thousands of common ancestors that link each creature to the next. For example, lions and tigers must have a common ancestor....man and ape must have a common ancestor...squirrels and skunks must have a common ancestor...bats and whales must have a common ancestor. Of course none of these common ancestors have been found -- or will ever be found -- but we're just supposed to take their word for it because they know more than us. But the reality is, this is not science -- this is nothing but brain-rotting blind faith in an intellectually bankrupt theory.
But the fairytale doesn't stop there. Evolutionists have made a living the past 75 years on the Big Joke that is the unseen beneficial random mutation. I honestly believe this is the most ridiculous aspect of the whole theory. The notion that a once-in-a-multi-million chance mutation can be beneficial and spread throughout a population via sexual reproduction is truly outrageous -- especially when you consider that populations are often separated by hundreds or thousands of miles and mutations are 99% destructive and/or deadly. Not only that, but a grand total of only 4,000 hominid bones have been dug up...(this includes humans, australopithecus, Neanderthals, Homo erectus, etc) Thus, there simply is not enough of a population for the likely occurrence of beneficial random mutations. Of course cumulative selection of thousands of such mutations has never -- and will never -- be witnessed.
And the fairytale continues. THE most crucial aspect to the whole evolutionary farce is natural selection. This, as well, has never been documented, studied or witnessed. As far as I know there have never been controlled experiments on animals in an attempt to prove this concept. Once again, we are supposed to fall in love with the theory -- not any actual evidence.
So there's the backbone to evolutionary theory -- and there is no real science to it -- it's all nothing but a wild fairytale....a fairytale dreamed up by a select few who have no intention of actually studying the material world -- as real science requires. Instead, their only intention is to give atheists around the world a vessel to latch on to so they can justify their own existence without having to acknowledge the truth of the Almighty Creator.
__________________
"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." Professor Louis Bounoure, National Center of Scientific Research.
If you think we are wrong about how the sun works there are two towns in Japan you ought to visit.
It's called coevolution. what happens is that when species are symbiotic and one of them speciates the other species also speciates. You can, and this has been done, make up cladograms for two groups of symbiotic taxa and lay them on top of one another and they match.
From what I have read, you've not demonstrated this to be true. You'd also need to demonstrate that the universe was created, but my initial thoughts would be that it is far from consistent, since Deism says God created the universe but is no longer accessible, and Pantheism says the universe is God (which I say as mainly being a vessel for equivocation at a later point) so Pandeism would propose that God created himself.
And this is where we leave the realm of science. Have fun in Never, Never Land.
Then creationists need to stop calling their pursuit "science". If you don't like the rules, then don't play the game. This is no different than a soccer player complaining that the goalie gets to use his hands. When you claim to be "scientific" you have to play by the rules.
All theories are models, and all are tentative. However, unlike creationism and theology, scientific theories are based on empirical data. If you don't like it, tough.
Do you have cousins? If yes, then you have just evidenced common ancestry. See how easy it is?
Nope, just one. Any two organisms on this planet share a single common ancestor.
Natural selection and random mutation can be easily demonstrated in bacteria using the Luria-Delbruck fluctation assay. I even started a thread on it here.
I can sum it up in two words: You can't count.If you want short, read my posts. I can sum it all up in three words: Evolution is a lie
Unless you can substantiate that postulation, don't expect to be taken seriously.First of all, life is not scientific -- life is spirtual.
Makes me wonder who is the third person in the trinity.I can sum it all up in three words: Evolution is a lie
1+1 actually equals two.
So there's the backbone to evolutionary theory -- and there is no real science to it -- it's all nothing but a wild fairytale....a fairytale dreamed up by a select few who have no intention of actually studying the material world -- as real science requires. Instead, their only intention is to give atheists around the world a vessel to latch on to so they can justify their own existence without having to acknowledge the truth of the Almighty Creator.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?