Evolution

Hector Medina · Oct 11, 2002

I'm here,

I'm sorry I was gonme for a few days College had me sidetracked.........

I'm here to debate!

Ask me a question and I'll answer it gladly within 24 hrs..

In Christ,

Hector

LouisBooth · Oct 11, 2002

"Maybe we can all play this game..."

LOL my applogies to blader, it was my mistake, I was typing a little fast it seems. Just a question, is it foe-net-ically different?

oh, great way to add to the converstation Ford.

fragmentsofdreams · Oct 12, 2002

Originally posted by LouisBooth
"Why does it matter what others say when you are talking to me? "

consistancy. It clearly shows me bias among evolutionists, which I thought there was. that's not. Not a big deal really.

Louis I'm sure that you dislike it when people try to make you account for other Christians. Please give people the courtesy of addressing them, not some stereotype.

LouisBooth · Oct 14, 2002

"Please give people the courtesy of addressing them, not some stereotype."

I did, I'm not saying its stereotypical, but it is true for evoluionists that post here it seems.

FordPrefect · Oct 16, 2002

I probably shouldn't have pounced on you alone, but I have seen alot of people calling blader that and it was getting on my nerves, although your name was fun to tease as well

LouisBooth · Oct 16, 2002

"I probably shouldn't have pounced on you alone, but I have seen alot of people calling blader that and it was getting on my nerves, although your name was fun to tease as well "

if you find teasing others fun, then I'd rather you just ignore my posts all together

FordPrefect · Oct 17, 2002

Ahh, Louis, now I understand, I thought that with your smiley in post #42, that you were having fun. But according to your response in #46 and by appending a smiley, I now realize that you don't understand how smileys should be used.

And your typing is attrocious, you have mispelled blader as bladder on four separate occasions.
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=372067&highlight=bladder#post372067
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=375536&highlight=bladder#post375536
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=372026&highlight=bladder#post372026
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=372018&highlight=bladder#post372018

And as to phonetically different? Unless you have a very poor grasp of the English language, you are replacing blader with the name of an organic bag for pee... which to do once by accident is one thing, but four times? Come on, I must not be the only person who likes teasing here, but at least I can admit it. (note no smiley here.)

LouisBooth · Oct 17, 2002

"And your typing is attrocious, you have mispelled blader as bladder on four separate occasions. "

Again, not on purpose, though it would seem yours were. My question about foe-net-ics was just that. They both sound the same when you say them. You're talking about definitions not foe-net-ics. I thought you would know the difference. I also appologized, something you haven't done  but I guess that's to be expected huh?

FordPrefect · Oct 19, 2002

Originally posted by LouisBooth
"And your typing is attrocious, you have mispelled blader as bladder on four separate occasions. "

Again, not on purpose, though it would seem yours were. My question about foe-net-ics was just that. They both sound the same when you say them. You're talking about definitions not foe-net-ics. I thought you would know the difference. I also appologized, something you haven't done  but I guess that's to be expected huh?

ok, phonetically blader has the same "a" as mate, bait, blade...
and bladder has the same "a" as hat, math

Since you don't expect me to apologize, I won't..

blader · Oct 19, 2002

Originally posted by LouisBooth

Again, not on purpose, though it would seem yours were. My question about foe-net-ics was just that. They both sound the same when you say them. You're talking about definitions not foe-net-ics. I thought you would know the difference. I also appologized, something you haven't done  but I guess that's to be expected huh?

Phonetically, it's "buh-lay-der" (blader: person who blades), not"buh-ladder" (bladder: a human organ) They're two different words, both in meaning and both in pronounciation.

Just thought I'd interject that.

Oh, and apology accepted. It's a common mistake. Blader's not the most common word in the word.

LouisBooth · Oct 21, 2002

"Oh, and apology accepted. It's a common mistake. Blader's not the most common word in the word."

No problem, I'm a blader myself. as for as how to pronounce it, there is some wiggle room.

Ford, your actions define you and you've made yourself clear to me so okay

blader · Oct 22, 2002

Originally posted by LouisBooth

No problem, I'm a blader myself. as for as how to pronounce it, there is some wiggle room.

Not to mince words... but no, there really isn't any. Unless you're a proponent of ebonics.

See the pronounciation for bladed, blade, blading. There is no word related to blade where the 'a' has any pronounciation that is similar to "bladder."

sulphur · Oct 22, 2002

Maybe evolutionists are getting tired of repeating the same evidence time after time to people who cannot accept it.Read some recent books by respected scientists and stop with rubbish.

FordPrefect · Oct 22, 2002

Originally posted by LouisBooth
[BFord, your actions define you and you've made yourself clear to me so okay [/B]

So, what is with the smiley again? Look, just because I am being terse with your rapidly changing positions on this minor issue does not make it clear to you, or anyone, what kind of person I am. I viewed your, and other's mispellings as a form of ad hominem on blader, who I respect quite a bit actually, and I was addressing it with some humour, originally.
However, you decided that since I was not being completely somber, I should ignore your posts from now on.

"then I'd rather you just ignore my posts all together "

I then showed you how often you mispelled the word, and what the mispelling meant. Had you on occasion wrote it blaader, or bllader, or something else, I would have let it go, but the mispelling could be construed as an attack, especially how often it happened.

As far as I know the only thing I may be required to apologize over would be the wording of, "your typing is attrocious" other than that, I feel I have not been insulting or derogatory. However, you may view the play on the spelling of your name as insultory, but the first response I got was, "oh, great way to add to the converstation Ford. " so I assumed you did not.

If you feel insulted over the typing comment I apologize for that, but I did not apologize previously because I felt I had nothing to apologize to you about.

Evolution

Questioning Roman Catholic

Well-Known Member

Critical loyalist

Well-Known Member

WWADGD

Well-Known Member

WWADGD

Well-Known Member

WWADGD

Evilutionist

Well-Known Member

Evilutionist

thylacine

WWADGD

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency