- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,203
- 52,659
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And a poor one at that.Evolution is not an explanation for origins of life on earth, it is an explanation for the diversity of life on earth.
Except that "God did it" is not an explanation. It has no descriptive or predictive content.Evolution is not an explanation for origins of life on earth, it is an explanation for the diversity of life on earth.
God forming heaven and earth and life on earth is an explanation for origins of life on earth.
Common misunderstanding.
Misunderstandings are common among creationists. It's why I posted the video.Evolution is not an explanation for origins of life on earth, it is an explanation for the diversity of life on earth.
God forming heaven and earth and life on earth is an explanation for origins of life on earth.
Common misunderstanding.
Simple misunderstanding on your part. Not to worry though, you can bone up on ToE when your need to know outweighs your need to believe.And a poor one at that.
That's the MYS16 gene Ucog. mentioned. Its a comparison of the two genes in the human and chimpanzee genomes.
Yeah, but it's all they got.Except that "God did it" is not an explanation. It has no descriptive or predictive content.
Truth is I've been thinking of doing exactly that but it's kind of difficult to get into this in detail given my personal problems, work and such. But to answer your question, of course I want to do that but I'm not really up to a serious study greeted by pedantic one liners and fallacious remarks. I'm always into one of these jousting matches when time permits but here lately I've been a little limited on time. Love to get into it with you on these issues, when I get a chance. Till then guess I'll just have to shoot down these pedantic fallacious arguments and wait till I can put together yet another well researched argument the descends into rhetorical head banging once again.We're still waiting for you to address it. And SRGAP2C and ARHGAP11B. Any chance you can actually do so?
Neither does 'God didn't do it'.Except that "God did it" is not an explanation. It has no descriptive or predictive content.
Yea, someone is keeping count.Careful with the ad hom there, Buddy.
Truth is I've been thinking of doing exactly that but it's kind of difficult to get into this in detail given my personal problems, work and such. {snip ironic litany of personal attacks.}
Yet another shameless ad hominem and notice they are getting smaller like a downward spiral getting smaller and smaller.
God forming heaven and earth and life on earth is an explanation for origins of life on earth.
Why would he answer a question that is so obviously just an ad hominem?!?!?!We're still waiting for you to address it. And SRGAP2C and ARHGAP11B. Any chance you can actually do so?
No. That's a claim / assertion about the origins of life on earth - and a religious one at that.
It is not an "explanation", because it has no explanatory power whatsoever.
Not a poor one, just one you do not agree with, which is fine. These forums should be for promoting understanding from both sides, not a battle.And a poor one at that.
Neither does 'God didn't do it'.
Your all over the road here. I contrasted 'God did it', with, 'God didn't do it', neither are scientific because natural science is an exclusively naturalistic epistemology. What you called a strawsman is inverse logic, there's always a flip side to logic.This is a bit of a strawman on your part since that is not the claim of the evolution side. We simply point out the fact that life evolved and that the Genesis account is clearly wrong. In no way does that say "God did not do it." It is a rather bold assumption on your part that your version of "God" is the only and correct version of "God".
Illogical?What you called a strawsman is inverse logic, there's always a flip side to logic.
The nature of logic is hot or cold, black or white, go or no go, With the statemet God didn't do it you have an inverse logic which is intuitively obvious. No escapi g it.Illogical?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?