• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution Promotes Brutality

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If your theory is that thalidomide causes birth defects, aren't you forced to give thalidomide to women?
If I lived in the Fourth Reich ... yes.

Otherwise ... no.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You believe that thalidomide causes birth defects,
I don't know about now ... but it did.
Loudmouth said:
... so you must use thalidomide to cause birth defects.
I don't even know what Thalidomide looks like.
Loudmouth said:
That is the logic you are using with evolution and eugenics.
The "logic" I'm using is called "history."
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I don't know about now ... but it did.I don't even know what Thalidomide looks like.The "logic" I'm using is called "history."

You are arguing that a belief in evolution means that you must kill the weakest because evolution says that the strongest survive.

I am arguing that your belief in thalidomide means that you must use it to cause birth defects because the conclusion is that thalidomide causes birth defects.

Same logic.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Oh, my.

What happened to a very important ingredient in my argument? the Fourth Reich?

Was it filtered out so your [imaginary] point can stand?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You have to belong to the Fourth Reich in order to believe that thalidomide causes birth defects?
Do you believe Thalidomide caused birth defects?
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,260
6,249
Montreal, Quebec
✟307,113.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Evolution gives no solid platform for this datum. There is, actually no right, no wrong....

With God, there is no question. Rock solid datum for right and wrong. When followed, all benefit.
I have difficulty understanding your thinking. There is no reason why a person cannot accept that evolution has happened and yet still choose to accept the moral framework presented in the Bible.

And the atheist, just like the believer, is choosing to ascribe to a particular moral framework (in all likelihood it will be generally similar to a framework based on Jesus' teaching).

Now we can debate the values of the moral framework with that of the atheist on points where they differ. But I see absolutely no justification for your claim that the atheist's framework has no "platform" - his platform is collective human experience and yours is the prescriptions of a book.

Can you actually make a case as to why the Biblical moral framework is superior? And to answer that "it's God's framework" is to OBVIOUSLY engage in circular reasoning. Clearly, if the atheist believed in the existence of a morally perfect God, he would accept the Biblical moral model.
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
To say that evolution "promotes" brutality is like saying that forensic science "promotes" murder. What a goofy notion.
Not worth a response, truthfully. You are blowing hot air, and playing alpha.


So I'm guessing you didn't like what I said? And what's with all this "playing alpha" nonsense? I saw the thread title and merely gave my opinion. I still think the notion is goofy, and I still equate it to claiming that forensic science "promotes" murder. If you disagree, that's fine. Just give me your reason for disagreeing. No need to assign motives or accusing others of "playing alpha". Just tell my why you disagree.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Do you believe Thalidomide caused birth defects?

Yes, but I don't use your logic whereby accepting a scientific conclusion means that you must act out that conclusion. If you think the theory of evolution commands us to kill the weak, then you must also think that thalidomide commands us to cause birth defects.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Yes, AV1611, if God is omnipotent, the he is most definitely responsible for evil. Why? God is being viewed as a cosmic dictator who decides it all. That is why Calvin, for example, made a point of arguing that all evil events were predetermined by God.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, AV1611, if God is omnipotent, the he is most definitely responsible for evil. Why? God is being viewed as a cosmic dictator who decides it all.
Don't listen to their views.
Hoghead1 said:
That is why Calvin, for example, made a point of arguing that all evil events were predetermined by God.
Calvin would have burned me at the stake (or had someone else do it).
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Nowhere in any evolution class or biology class is it taught that we ought to kill of the weakest in any species.

I never said it did...

I said that people can use it to support their agenda.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Well, if you disagreed with Calvin, you definitely risked being burnt. Michael Servet disagreed with Calvin on the Trinity. Calvin issued a death threat on him, saying if he ever tried to go through Geneva (Calvin's city), Calvin would have him executed. Poor Servet tried to sneak through, as all roads went through Geneva. Calvin's police caught him and Calvin had him burnt. Back to omnipotence. The latter means that God has complete and total monopolistic control over everything that happens. Hence, yes, it does mean that God is a cosmic dictator that that he is responsible for all evil events. If we have some real degree of freedom, then God cannot be omnipotent, as we have some real degree of power in our own right.
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
By any rational or logical terms. Scientific theories don't tell us what we ought to do.

Where did these "rational and logical" terms come from? What are they based on? Logic and rational are terms based on a datum of accepted practices. Who set the datum?

What you are describing is obedience, not morality or ethics. "I'm just following orders" is what the Nazi's tried to get away with, since someone has already Godwin'ed the thread.
I don't think I am. I'm saying that the fact that it is wrong to take something that is not ours, kill another human, lie to someone, abuse someone, take the basic human rights from someone..... is based on ethics and morals. These came from somewhere.

We are all obedient to rules. Speeding, smoking in a non smoking area, not picking up after our dog... we are all obedient to these. If not we are, usually, punished in small or large ways.

When someone starts to make rules that bend or break the moral laws that society has deemed foundational, and, people follow them, you are witnessing the exact sort of thing that evolution, may not promote but it certainly does not have any leg to stand on against it.

As for creationists, we can say "that is wrong because it goes against the teachings of our creator who is superior to us"

Evolutionists can only say "that is wrong because some other evolved organism or group of organisms says so...... If that is the case then another organism or group of organisms must have the same right to oppose it. All organisms must have the same rank... unless.... some are superior to others.... then...your done.
 
Upvote 0