Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now I already know this nonsense comes from the evolutionist Bible Talkorigins. Again even Mark Leakey admit it no where as simple as Talkorigins make people believe.
Those transitional fossils required a very powerful Imaginator in order to slap a butch of bones together and dogmatically claim it's your ancestor.
You are not fooling me I know evolution is your religious belief.
No, but thou shalt not break the rules.The USGA Golf Rules describe how humans should act on the golf course. Is that a Bible?
All you are showing is that you hold your own religious beliefs in such low regard that you would use them as a term of derision.
Now come on. You don't preach golf like you do evolution. But I agree golf can becomes someone religion but very unlike.
Everyone is a "scientist" by nature.All you are doing is showing how you hold your own religious beliefs in low regard, so low that you would use religion as a term of derision. It is a form of intellectual suicide bombing.
Do you ever see scientists calling creationism "just another science"? No? Ever wonder why? It's because scientists hold science in high regard and would not use it as a term of derision.
What you might call ancestors of man or early man.What post-flood man? Where is your evidence for this flood, and evidence that changes came about around this flood?
The burden of proof lies with you. If you can't present evidence to back your claims, then your claims will be rejected.
All around you. It is seen in every telescope and in every rock.
Which one is the first human...and why would you have apes in the same line up?? Pretty shabby. Post flood man was human, but what you call 'looking more human' is merely looking more present nature human!Then do we see progressively more human-like fossils as we move through time?
.
Scripture makes no such claim. And if your reference is to that after the flood people did not live as long as before, that is not a change in any physics or chemistry or their processes.
Since we evolved there is no "first human" the line would be arbitrary at best. And I don't see what you are complaining about. Since we are apes all of the skulls that you see are ape skulls.Which one is the first human...and why would you have apes in the same line up?? Pretty shabby. Post flood man was human, but what you call 'looking more human' is merely looking more present nature human!
Because now some are onto you and what you have been doing in lumping apes in with post flood man.Why should I stop?
You have zero evidence evolution in the former nature was slow! You have lost all.Since you have presented zero evidence, I have lost nothing.
So do ants. Whoopee do.Do you deny that man shares features with apes?
And yet you cannot find any evidence for your "different nature" in the scriptures. Your beliefs are neither scriptural nor scientific.Scripture tells of many things that were different actually. The reasoned conclusion is that nature was different. From the timeframe of the flood, we know about how much time species had to evolve from the ark kinds. A present nature would not do it! You are faced with unbelief...or belief. Period.
No first human? Ha. Too much monkey business for me to mess around with.Since we evolved there is no "first human" the line would be arbitrary at best. And I don't see what you are complaining about. Since we are apes all of the skulls that you see are ape skulls.
So you've never seen a car reproduce and thus conclude that cars don't reproduce.Cars don't reproduce..... I hope this isn't shocking information to you.
So you've never seen a car reproduce and thus conclude that cars don't reproduce.
But let me guess... you've never seen the super simple single-celled organism that was the foundation of all life, but you are firmly convinced that it existed.
And let me tender another guess... you don't see any conflict between those two positions.
Because now some are onto you and what you have been doing in lumping apes in with post flood man.
You have zero evidence evolution in the former nature was slow!
But let me guess... you've never seen the super simple single-celled organism that was the foundation of all life, but you are firmly convinced that it existed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?