- Feb 15, 2013
- 8,824
- 6,252
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Does the falsification of ToE imply a creator? Why not?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Does the falsification of ToE imply a creator? Why not?
TOE is the natural materialistic explanation for the diversity of life. God is the supernatural explanation of life. The universe's existence is more cohesive with a Creator than a natural cause. TOE could be proven wrong and people would still look for a natural cause for the universe and life itself.
I don't buy it. They want to explain something from nothing. It is harder for me to believe in that, instead of the truth, a Maker.
God made all that is, was and ever will be. That is my belief and I believe I have no right to be swayed from it. On a Christian forum, I believe it is my right to believe in God instead of being forced to reject God.
I think it is completely illogical to think that the universe just exists for no reason, that man has reason from a process devoid of reason and that only the natural world explains the natural world.
That is jumping ahead though. Some stuff happened, your saying, without saying how that stuff even exist's. Like I said, I don't buy it.
What does evolution have to do with rejecting God? For that matter, what does it have to do with getting something from nothing? Evolution describes how life has changed over time. That's all. It's the only theory available that explains the diversity of life.I don't buy it. They want to explain something from nothing. It is harder for me to believe in that, instead of the truth, a Maker.
God made all that is, was and ever will be. That is my belief and I believe I have no right to be swayed from it. On a Christian forum, I believe it is my right to believe in God instead of being forced to reject God.
That is what I am saying, the naturalist has no reason to believe what they believe.
What does evolution have to do with rejecting God? For that matter, what does it have to do with getting something from nothing? Evolution describes how life has changed over time. That's all. It's the only theory available that explains the diversity of life.
I am only referring to those that deny God and claim a natural cause for the universe and life.We are all naturalist. A naturalist is for God, the Maker of all. Claiming to be, is a mistake only by those who reject God.
I am only referring to those that deny God and claim a natural cause for the universe and life.
I really dislike the fact that we don't have the Christian Icon anymore on our names. It is hard to know who is what on here now. I am a Christian and very much know God exists and created the universe and everything in it.What are you saying though?
Do you believe in God? I do.
If you are trying to say God doesn't exist, you have already cut me off. In that case, I have no need or want to discuss with you, ever.
I really dislike the fact that we don't have the Christian Icon anymore on our names. It is hard to know who is what on here now. I am a Christian and very much know God exists and created the universe and everything in it.
I'm trying to say that evolution has nothing to do with whether God exists or not. It's a scientific theory, not a religious belief.What are you saying though?
So do I. I don't know what that has to do with what I wrote, but whatever.Do you believe in God? I do.
You never talk to atheists?If you are trying to say God doesn't exist, you have already cut me off. In that case, I have no need or want to discuss with you, ever.
I'm trying to say that evolution has nothing to do with whether God exists or not. It's a scientific theory, not a religious belief.