Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,090
- 7,429
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So it should not happen.
I only answer good questions.
I only answer good questions.
I am sure that we could start a thousand threads on the things that you do not know about.
Vestigial does not mean "has no function". That would be your first mistake. Vestigial means, "not having the same function as that seen in other species". The human tailbone, for example, does not support the movement of a tail as seen in other species. That makes the human tailbone vestigial, even if it is found to have other rudimentary functions.
More importantly, vestigial organs are evidence for evolution because they match the proposed evolutionary history of species. For example, we find vestigial pelvises in whales. However, we don't find any vestigial feathers in any mammal species. Vestigial organs match evolutionary history, and that is why they are evidence.
????????????
You made a claim while talking in abstracts.
I asked you for a specific example, instead of abstracts, to illustrate the accuracy of your claim.
That is a "bad question" now?
It seems more of a case of you not being willing and able to support your nonsense.
Oh, that's his standard schtick. If he's faced with a question he can't answer, he'll deem it a question that's not worth his time answering and ignore it.
Please don't make it personal
I say what I know. What I know is that it is wrong.
Please don't make it personal
It's not personal. It's a consistent observation of juve's behaviour.
I see no reason why it shouldn't be called out.
Hi 'Juve' ( is this a name you allow posters to use - I don't want to be rude )
Would you please elaborate on the second sentence?
My experience told me that evolution is wrong.
And yet all of the scientific evidence shows that you are wrong.
Haven't bothered watching it as the description is incorrect. Again...the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with explaining the origins of life.If you've enjoyed that, you should like this. A little ditty by Billy Preston which is all of the argument one needs to dispel the myth of macro evolution as an explanation for the origin of life (or anything else in the material universe). Hit it, Billy!
I don't know much about vestigial organ about human. But I know what happened to the wrong idea about the appendix. As a consequence, I don't have any confidence to any of those suggestions. Provided that human is a really really bad example of evolution.
You need to finish paragraphs before you make a response.So it should not happen.
Adapting to a new environment gives you access to potential new feeding grounds and new hiding places.
Nonsense. Back up your claims with sources/evidence.So, some capabilities that dealt with the old vanished environment should disappear. The function of the life form would keep its simplicity and efficiency.
This would be the last time I reiterate my point. If no new argument appear, then this would be it.
Evolution history shows a trend of change. So it is wrong.
So, some capabilities that dealt with the old vanished environment should disappear. The function of the life form would keep its simplicity and efficiency.
This would be the last time I reiterate my point. If no new argument appear, then this would be it.
Evolution history shows a trend of change. So it is wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?