• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolution in action - gene duplication and flower evolution

ushishir

Active Member
Apr 9, 2005
72
2
Visit site
✟22,702.00
Faith
Atheist
Interesting news:

"Analysis of flower genes reveals the fate of an ancient gene duplication


In a step that advances our ability to discern the ancient evolutionary relationships between different genes and their biological functions, researchers have provided insight into the present-day outcome of a single gene duplication that occurred over a hundred million years ago in an ancestor of modern plants. The work is reported in Current Biology by a team led by Brendan Davies of the University of Leeds, England.


Gene duplication--a relatively uncommon event in which a single copy of a gene is transformed into two separate copies--is thought to play a key role in the evolution of new gene functions. Duplications are important because they effectively allow at least one of the gene copies to evolve while the (likely important) function of the original gene can remain intact. In this way, the duplication of pre-existing genetic information provides the raw material from which new gene functions can evolve, thereby contributing to the evolution of genetic complexity and the evolution of sophisticated life forms.

Very many such gene-duplication events have shaped the evolution of today's living species, but tracing the evolution of a specific single gene over millions of years of evolution--and over potentially several gene-duplication events--can pose a significant challenge. One way in which this can be overcome is for researchers studying a particular modern-day gene to look at neighboring genes in different related species. Genes derived from a common ancestral gene region will still share similarities in neighboring gene sequences, both in terms of gene identity and the order such sequences appear within the chromosome. This kind of preserved gene order is known as genome synteny.

In the new work, researchers have used synteny to clarify the evolution of genes essential for the development of floral reproductive organs, stamens and carpels. The subjects of their work were two genes that appear to play identical functions in two different plant species: the AGAMOUS (AG) gene of the mustard plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the PLENA (PLE) gene of the snapdragon, Antirrhinum majus. Both genes are required for the development of flower reproductive structures, and when these genes are mutated, the plants form so-called double flowers, in which petals and sepals replace stamens and carpels. AG and PLE are very closely related genes, and they clearly have nearly identical function, suggesting that they are derived from the same single gene inherited from a common ancestor. However, analysis of synteny in the AG and PLE regions unambiguously showed that AG and PLE are not derived from the same ancestral gene, but that they instead represent two different products of a gene-duplication event that occurred around 125 million years ago in a common ancestor of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. The other genes created in that ancient gene-duplication event became altered, in different ways, so that they now have new functions in Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. These findings provide one of the first demonstrations of how an essential developmental function can be randomly assigned to either product of a gene-duplication event. The work defines a new standard for the evidence required to establish the evolutionary relationships of genes from different species."

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/cp-aof081705.php

The Paper can be downloaded here:

http://www.genetics.ac.cn/fruit/sdarticle.pdf

Current Biology, Vol. 15, 1508–1512, August 23, 2005,
Evolution in Action: Following Function in Duplicated Floral Homeotic Genes
Barry Causier, Rosa Castillo, Junli Zhou, Richard Ingram, Yongbiao Xue, Zsuzsanna Schwarz-Sommer, and Brendan Davies,
 

ushishir

Active Member
Apr 9, 2005
72
2
Visit site
✟22,702.00
Faith
Atheist
seventytwo said:
But the snapdragon is still a snapdragon!

and arabidopsis and snapdragons are still both flowering plants, see you never get new 'kinds' (if your definition of kind is infinitely expandable) ;)

So any creationist comment on this example of the evolution of new genetic information?
 
Upvote 0

ushishir

Active Member
Apr 9, 2005
72
2
Visit site
✟22,702.00
Faith
Atheist
Matthew777 said:
We may be able to observe changes in the genes of flowers, but does that does show how the first flowers came into existence?

No, although ancestoral genes do exist in non flowering plants, which have a much longer history.

This example does illustrate mutation and natural selection creating new genetic information leading to morphological change - all of which creationists assert cannot occur.

So are you arguing that all flowering plants are related to each other but not non-flowering plants and so were created during the early cretaceous?
 
Upvote 0

futzman

Regular Member
Jul 26, 2005
527
18
71
✟771.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Matthew777 said:
We may be able to observe changes in the genes of flowers, but does that does show how the first flowers came into existence?

And this is a rebuttal of the OP how?

Futz (still wondering what God didn't like about 4400 genera of Brachiopoda...)
 
Upvote 0