Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why not?And your understanding of evolution is completely wrong. A member of the Family Canidae will never stop being a member of the Canidae family no matter how it mutates.
Why not?
If there's one thing evolutionary scientists are "good" at, it's dreaming up theories. Evolutionary theories are a dime a dozen, and a great deal of them can't be tested, which means they don't even qualify as science. Theories that can't be tested are just worthless stories, which suits evolutionary science just fine, because it's a bs-artist's paradise.
Take Stephen Jay Gould, for example: His books were lapped up by the evo-masses, but his ideas didn't advance science one bit. His famous theory - Punctuated Equilbrium - surprise, surprise - can't be tested. Gould was your typical evolutionary "scientist" ... a purveyor of worthless pseudo-scientific stories.
Evolutionary science is the most overrated, useless branch of science in history ... but that doesn't matter, because it's raison d'être is not to advance science, but to advance atheism.
If there's one thing evolutionary scientists are "good" at, it's dreaming up theories. Evolutionary theories are a dime a dozen, and a great deal of them can't be tested, which means they don't even qualify as science. Theories that can't be tested are just worthless stories, which suits evolutionary science just fine, because it's a bs-artist's paradise.
Take Stephen Jay Gould, for example: His books were lapped up by the evo-masses, but his ideas didn't advance science one bit. His famous theory - Punctuated Equilbrium - surprise, surprise - can't be tested. Gould was your typical evolutionary "scientist" ... a purveyor of worthless pseudo-scientific stories.
Evolutionary science is the most overrated, useless branch of science in history ... but that doesn't matter, because it's raison d'être is not to advance science, but to advance atheism.
Why not?
It looks like a picture of a cover of a book.What's this then?
And it would be.Evolution through imperfections ... sounds like an oxymoron.
No.So, the human brain is the result of genetic imperfections.
See aboveThat's hilarious!
No. How are you getting all these bizzare fantasies?And genetic imperfections are somehow responsible for producing eyes that somehow produced nerves that somehow connected to a brain, which is also the result of genetic imperfections. Wow, that's some theory!
Ah. That is your problem.According to my understading of ToE ....
A population of dogs + mutations + selection + lots of time = an animal that doesn't belong to the Family Canidae
It looks like a picture of a cover of a book.
Why?
Thankyou.Truth matters.
Huh?God's word is truth.
BINGO!Baseless statements by scientists are not truth.
Post your list. I'm pretty sure I've already read about most of the points on it.I'd give you a list of pronouncements of "facts" that have proven wrong if I thought you'd take notice. I'd give you a list of the phony, peer-reviewed papers that were false or plagiarised. I'd tell you about the guy who fraudulently obtained grants worth millions or the other man who almost defrauded the Nobel Prize committee. Of course, none of this matters to someone blinded by his worship of science.
Baseless statements by scientists are not truth. It's about time that evolutionary "scientists" started each new pronouncement with "We were wrong". One day the light will dawn and they will realise that they were wrong about evolution as a theory. Science is not God. It is as flawed, dishonest, corrupt, self-serving, money hungry and arrogant as any other human endeavor. Sure, there are honest scientists as well. But to elevate science to some kind of infallible, noble and ethically pure pursuit is to deny reality.
I'm not anti science.
.............Particle research for example. Now some clown has decided that quantum physics determines that there is no reality. Try telling that to the people of Ukraine. Is there intelligent life on Mars? It's hard enough to find it on earth. How about solving the problems of this world before screwing up another planet.
1. Prove scientifically that the Theory of Evolution is invalid. Please don’t say that there are no transitional fossils. Many have been discovered. Don’t say there are gaps. Whenever a transitional fossil is found more gaps are created.Depends what you mean by "Evolution". If you mean, "All life on earth descended from a common ancestor via a natural process of mutations and natural selection", then I would say you're wrong on both counts:
1.Evolution is poor science, which is dressed up to look like good science and aggresively marketed as such.
2. It has everything to do with atheism. The aim of the game is to provide an explanation for life on earth without the need of a Creator.
"Evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented." - William Provine
Evidently, you are one of the billions who has been deceived by this fable.
That's Jesus' job, in my opinion.1. Prove scientifically that the Theory of Evolution is invalid.
You didn't answer my question, so how much biology do you actually understand?Because that's how biology works. How much of biology do you actually understand?
Sounds like you can't answer my question and have resorted to guessing.I explained before. It's the past, the genetic history of a species... that can't change.
Enough to support the assertion of: 'Because that's how biology works' with objective evidence.You didn't answer my question, so how much biology do you actually understand?
A "creationists (sic) view of evolution"?Ah. That is your problem.
You have a creationists view of evolution.
Try reading a few books by biologists.
Have you seen any non-dogs pull of that stunt?If a human can evolve from a fish, why can't a non-dog evolve from a dog?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?