Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Aryan supremacy is an example of it, is it not?What do you consider inbreeding?
What is an evolution attempt?
Aryan supremacy is an example of it, is it not?
Breeding like genes, or something like that?
(I'm not going to get into a science discussion on this, or I'll get vegomaticked.)
Aryan supremacy is an example of it, is it not?
I guess that's one way to look at it.
But the gene pool since Adam & Eve has steadily been declining.
ID Iis not a theory. Claims are made for it, some disproved,The same could be said about intelligent design.
Of course not.
I had an organic chem prof whose religion disallowed
evolution.
When we talked about it one time, he said straight out that
he had no evidence thats its false, just that he had doubts for
statidtical reasons.
Nobody has ever been able to disprove ToE.
Fact.
Simple reason being that to do so requires facts
contrary to ToE-
And
Nobody has ever uncovered such facts.
Opinions are fine.
But since nobody has said facts they cannot truthfully
say they know.
Now, I may have been unfair to you. Maybe you do not
say you know ToE is false, and have elsewhere clearly stated
that is just your opinion.
No your absolutely correct I can’t say TOE is false I just believe that it is given the evidence that I see.
ID Iis not a theory.
You cannot disprove the " theory" that there's a teapot
outbthere orbiting the sun.
ToE being an actual theory is quite vulnerable in that one
discovery " the cambrian bunny" could falsify it.
No. I mean the question is fundamentally flawed.So then by that logic you believe that all evolution attempts are successful? That evolution is not the result of random genetic mutation but is actually an organized form of mutation?
And, going by what you've said, its clear you have seen very very little.
Are you sure its not actually religion that is why you cannot believe it?
I think intelligent design was played around with for awhile, until God put a stop to it with a flood.No I believed in intelligent design long before I became a Christian. I thought that we may be the result of extraterrestrial biological engineering. It was intelligent design that convinced my beliefs in God who would technically fall into that category.
An attempt implies a conscious agency. Evolutionary mechanisms are not conscious agencies. Nothing attempted to make the neck of the giraffe longer. Random mutations generated some giraffe ancestors with longer necks. Natural selection favoured this in some environments, so that animals with the mutation prospered (i.e. produced more offspring). That's evolution.
I fail to see how you can support that.You're still claiming a scenario that dodges my point ... of course.
It is actually true for the process of getting from non-life to a complex organism like man. Regardless of how many different kinds/forms of single celled organisms/multicelled, etc., the fact is that the evolution MUST go from non-life THROUGH the single celled and onto complex life.
There is no way around that.
The only way complex life bypasses that process and just appears is CREATION.
I think intelligent design was played around with for awhile, until God put a stop to it with a flood.
And, going by what you've said, its clear you have seen very very little.
Are you sure its not actually religion that is why you cannot believe it?
Think..., you are the one who has been consistently rude throughout our exchanges. I asked you for clarification of what you meant. I told you how what you wrote appeared to mean. I gave you the opportunity to set the record straight. This is what reasonable people do in discussion. It is clear you are here only to provoke, flame and goad.Nope. Never did claim that. Would you like to take the honest approach and post my exact comment without doctoring it to show exactly what I DID say? Maybe I'll humor you to go from there.
You clearly had difficulty understanding that evolution has a random component and a non-random component. If English were your second language it would be reasonable for me to make more of an effort to be comprehensible. I do not need to have my attempts at having a civilised conversation with you greeted with personal assaults.More unnecessary personal insults and rudeness, completely unchecked.
Let me explain further. In explaining aspects of evolution many scientists and popularisers of science choose to speak of Nature as if it were a conscious agency. The story flows more smoothly this way.Fair enough I see your point I just thought the manner in which I was using the word was obvious. Everyone else here seemed to understand it.
No I believed in intelligent design long before I became a Christian. I thought that we may be the result of extraterrestrial biological engineering. It was intelligent design that convinced my beliefs in God who would technically fall into that category.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?