Maybe "crippled by cognitive dissonance" is a bit harsh on reflection, sorry about that, I'd like to retract crippled and replace it with "clouded".
I don't understand why you think evolution is magical?
Evolution is change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
That's all, it's hardly magical.
To claim that we humans evolved from amoeba that popped out of a wet rock into the primordial soup, then grew legs by slowly creating hundreds of billions of cells which are all placed exactly where they need to be through no design, or will of anyone or anything, but the evolving environment (Mother Nature and Father Time) is magical, it's a fantasy.
YES, .. observing by dissecting, magnifying tissues of animals to learn their make up is science, it's the story how all this appeared out of nowhere, and over the 14 billion years it all assembled itself is the magic.
Nothing to do with what I posted.
So what I write is irrelevant?
Thanks.
Adaptation and natural selection, yes... or as we call it... evolution.
God created us with the ability of "natural selection", and when that breaks down (AIDS, Cancer etc.) no nature will help you, besides, why would she? It's not like she cares, or has you in mind, right?
I personally don't share your belief in God, but sure, no problem.
That's fine, .. many are called, but only a few are chosen.
Who's making up fantastical stories? It appears to be you fantasizing about what "evolutionists" might say. Red Herring.
You know well, Lucy and the hundreds of Red Herring stories of dried up jaw bones of roasted pigs found in the dirt. I shown you the videos in the other post. I go by what they say about as simple as a jawbone with a half row of teeth, so I derived from that; Oh what stories my brothers frozen lungs would create for Evolutionists!
What has this got to do with evolution?
You were trying to convince me of evolution because two birds, or lizards of the same species stopped mating in another country.
You present a frankly stupid and twisted parody of what scientists actually do, did you read the examples and links I presented? There was none of this garbage in there.
Example of your "same species that don't mate with each other" because they are evolving. You are not much up on evolution are you, like the Post Human 2.0 and other trans humanistic projects.
Go to a
Burning Man event and you will understand the latest in the past four billion years of "human-evolution".
I answered this already in the topic that got closed down - We don't know as it has yet to be discovered.
Yet you are certain of man evolving from amoeba, lizard, rat, gorilla, ____(common ancestor)____ human, right? Only that last one is missing, .. with all the eight million living species, right?
I'd suggest a bit of reading into why we know such a creature existed at that point on our family tree.
Yes, because your Religion called Evolution wouldn't work without it. So you say it's there, only can't prove it, and don't know what it is, .. right!?
LOL.
If you can't give me the names of all your paternal ancestors going back to the year 1066 then you don't obviously don't exist. (Yes, it is a ridiculous thing to say).
Again for the hundredth time, I don't care what their name was, Lucy, Edna, Koko whatever is fine,
I asked you what "species" it was?
Of course I don't see you like that, I see you as a fellow human, what makes you say that?
So with all this knowledge about human development, and evolution for the past 4.2 billion years and you don't consider me an evolving ape, an animal of the Homo family? I'm hurt.
So what do you consider this 'fellow human' originated from, can't think of anything lower than an amoeba, which evolved to apes, ..
You see, if I was an Evolutionist, and put a sign on my store door: "No Animals Allowed", you can bet no animals would come in, .. hair or hairless!?
There you go again with your ridiculous parody of what biologists do, did you not see the links I posted? You have no excuse for this behaviour now.
Er, if you read the links I posted they are doing exactly that, using evidence provided from natural selection.
No, .. it proves that animals were created after their kind!
Providing evidence how one species evolves/morphs/gives birth to another species would prove evolution of species by natural selection.
Showing same species changing, adapting to their environment is not "speciation into another species". I went into the hot Arizona mountain wilderness for many months, and I adapted to the harsh environment to where I could run up the side of the mountain where I would sneak up to deer resting in the thorn bushes in front of me, and could hike all day in the hot sun without any food or water.
I asked for evidence of "HUMAN" evolution/speciation from what you guys claim we evolved from, why you keep avoiding my request, .. giving me all these same but different animals "after their kind" and their makeup?
Like Dawkins in his video: "Why are there Chimpanzees?" Who asked him that anyways, it is all hand waving to distract us from the real issue, that "No species has ever evolved into another species, and never will"
If you categorize a human as an animal of the Ape family, stick with it.
But I asked you to show me how I speciated millions of times over the 4.2 billion years from amoeba to human, yet you cannot show me any actual evidence of that.
You give me millions of color gradients between two species and try to justify this by showing me a few dried up bone fragments, hardly the evidence for the color gradients, .. and then tell me that even those few transitional species have died out!
Really?
Then Dawkins shows only THREE, the gorilla, the common ancestor, and a human lady, but can't even name the ONE in-between species he calls "the Common Ancestor" that gave rise to human. That's just ONE, and you don't even know what species that was???
My links demonstrated that evolutionary research is science, and you have done nothing to refute that. You don't like it, we get that, but throwing around perjorative terms won't help. It just makes your arguments seem weak and shallow.
Yes, observing same and different species, dissecting them for study etc. is science, but their fantastic claims how this dissected animals cells and bones have evolved from that there different species of cells and bones is NOT science.
Science would be actually showing this happening, where it would be revealed on the macro scale too. Like a gorilla turning into a human, one day gorilla, and finally after 4 billion years, .. whala! Look people, the entire population of gorillas have finally made that genetic switch, and it is now human! Yesterday the DNA of a Gorilla, and today, after 4 billion years, .. look, the DNA shows it is a human!
But because it never happened and never will, they put African Negro Pigmies to show it happens.
Whoah, try again? I didn't try to convince you of anything. I joined the conversation because you asserted that "evolution isn't science" or some such thing. I posted a tiny fraction of scientific papers that show, with empirical results, that your assertion is utterly wrong.
You showed me empirical evidence of birds (and whatnot) after their kind, NOT Evolution.
Up to that point I agree it is science.
It's the Evolution/Speciation of one distinct species into a completely different species that's NOT science.
Simply because it never happens even after waiting 4 billion years, and never did.
Until you show me why those examples of Evolutionary research aren't science (without all the red herrings and subject changing) I'll consider that you have conceded the point.
Not that I think that it really matters anyway, you don't get to say what science is or isn't, especially when you are demonstrating that you barely understand what it is, the reason why you are coming up with all these PRATTS is obvious.
But I can remind Evolutionists what science is can't I?
The research is science, the results they make up from the research on Evolution is not. So you have failed to prove "Evolution as science". Just because a surgeon who belongs to the Evolution Religion worked on me and fixed me up does not mean I evolved from an amoeba, a rat, then a gorilla.
PRATTS? .. how about show me just ONE time, just one speciation, not a thousand!?
Thanks.