Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evidence of gravitational waves, or evidence of confirmation bias?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 71360311" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>I'm already 3 for 3, and I'm still waiting for you two to explain what it would take for you to change your position on this topic. 10 for 10? Two out the three detectors see the same basic chirp? No visual verification *ever* even with a well triangulated signal?</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to go away. I'm going to keep pointing out that LIGO is 0 for X, currently 0 for 3, every single time that they keep releasing *another* one of these hokey claims of "discovery" without any visual support. This is going to be fun. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I'm fully prepared to change my opinion on this topic if and when LIGO ever puts up some real visual or neutrino evidence to support their goofy claims, but not a moment before hand.</p><p></p><p>Where's the visual beef?</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]Ug75diEyiA0[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 71360311, member: 627"] I'm already 3 for 3, and I'm still waiting for you two to explain what it would take for you to change your position on this topic. 10 for 10? Two out the three detectors see the same basic chirp? No visual verification *ever* even with a well triangulated signal? I'm not going to go away. I'm going to keep pointing out that LIGO is 0 for X, currently 0 for 3, every single time that they keep releasing *another* one of these hokey claims of "discovery" without any visual support. This is going to be fun. :) I'm fully prepared to change my opinion on this topic if and when LIGO ever puts up some real visual or neutrino evidence to support their goofy claims, but not a moment before hand. Where's the visual beef? [MEDIA=youtube]Ug75diEyiA0[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evidence of gravitational waves, or evidence of confirmation bias?
Top
Bottom