Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OllieFranz" data-source="post: 64650135" data-attributes="member: 194533"><p>No. You are supposed to explain ID in your own words. You can use terms that are commonly defined in the "science, " and even define those terms for people who are unfamiliar with them. You can then post links that confirm your statements in peer-reviewed papers. In posting the link, you can include a brief, on-topic quote to show that the link does confirm your statement (no more than two sentences or 10% of the entire paper, whichever is less) without breaking either copyright laws or forum rules. </p><p></p><p>This shows that you understand the topic yourself and assures us that the link will include an answer to our question. Many of you posts have had a very strange vagueness to them. It was as if you were saying, "I have no idea what you are talking about, but maybe this paper is something that might have your answer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OllieFranz, post: 64650135, member: 194533"] No. You are supposed to explain ID in your own words. You can use terms that are commonly defined in the "science, " and even define those terms for people who are unfamiliar with them. You can then post links that confirm your statements in peer-reviewed papers. In posting the link, you can include a brief, on-topic quote to show that the link does confirm your statement (no more than two sentences or 10% of the entire paper, whichever is less) without breaking either copyright laws or forum rules. This shows that you understand the topic yourself and assures us that the link will include an answer to our question. Many of you posts have had a very strange vagueness to them. It was as if you were saying, "I have no idea what you are talking about, but maybe this paper is something that might have your answer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
Top
Bottom