Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="createdtoworship" data-source="post: 64637155" data-attributes="member: 29008"><p>The most reasonable assumption is that life did not start with RNA &#8230;. The transition to an RNA world, like the origins of life in general, is fraught with uncertainty and is plagued by a lack of experimental data.6</p><p></p><p>above quote from:</p><p>Joyce, G. F., 1989. RNA evolution and the origins of life. Nature, 338:217&#8211;224.</p><p></p><p>here is an even more scholarly article about self replicating RNA and other issues in an RNA world.</p><p></p><p>"The flaw is in the logic -- that this experimental control by researchers in a modern laboratory could have been available on the early Earth."</p><p></p><p>"The sudden appearance of a large self-copying molecule such as RNA was exceedingly improbable. ... [The probability] is so vanishingly small that its happening even once anywhere in the visible universe would count as a piece of exceptional good luck."</p><p></p><p>Robert Shapiro, "A Simpler Origin for Life," Scientific American, pp. 46-53 (June, 2007).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="createdtoworship, post: 64637155, member: 29008"] The most reasonable assumption is that life did not start with RNA …. The transition to an RNA world, like the origins of life in general, is fraught with uncertainty and is plagued by a lack of experimental data.6 above quote from: Joyce, G. F., 1989. RNA evolution and the origins of life. Nature, 338:217–224. here is an even more scholarly article about self replicating RNA and other issues in an RNA world. "The flaw is in the logic -- that this experimental control by researchers in a modern laboratory could have been available on the early Earth." "The sudden appearance of a large self-copying molecule such as RNA was exceedingly improbable. ... [The probability] is so vanishingly small that its happening even once anywhere in the visible universe would count as a piece of exceptional good luck." Robert Shapiro, "A Simpler Origin for Life," Scientific American, pp. 46-53 (June, 2007). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
Top
Bottom