Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ursus scientia" data-source="post: 64637098"><p>Nope. Catalaysis of D-isomer polymerisation would result in a right-handed DNA strand, regardless of the starting mixture. The catalyst is, by virtue of its selectivity, likely a semi-complex biomolecule. How did that appear? Nobody knows yet.</p><p></p><p>None of this has anything to do with evolution, I'm not a specialist and it's a muggy area of research. Strike me all you want : P</p><p></p><p>From the mysterious chirality problem you pose, I assume that your argument is "you can't explain any of this therefore I'm right". The case is more that the inorganic origin of life is a current research topic: there is a lot we don't know and that is why scientists have jobs. Until then, neither of us can really say anything about it. It is a boring topic of conversation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ursus scientia, post: 64637098"] Nope. Catalaysis of D-isomer polymerisation would result in a right-handed DNA strand, regardless of the starting mixture. The catalyst is, by virtue of its selectivity, likely a semi-complex biomolecule. How did that appear? Nobody knows yet. None of this has anything to do with evolution, I'm not a specialist and it's a muggy area of research. Strike me all you want : P From the mysterious chirality problem you pose, I assume that your argument is "you can't explain any of this therefore I'm right". The case is more that the inorganic origin of life is a current research topic: there is a lot we don't know and that is why scientists have jobs. Until then, neither of us can really say anything about it. It is a boring topic of conversation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for Design (3)
Top
Bottom