Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It is strongly suggested that repentence is necessary for the forgiveness and sanctification that Jesus bestows, but we are specifically told that we are to offer our forgiveness freely and unconditionally, and that it is our offering such forgiveness, even before repentence, that might rescue those who sin against us.
It is an argument from ignorance, otherwise known as a God of the Gaps argument. Lack of evidence for evolution is not evidence for ID.
Again, arguing against evolution is not evidence for ID.
How high do ostriches and penguins fly, I wonder.....hmmm!
I gave up long ago trying to debate with sound arguments and evidences.
they don't
ere, remember when it was said that avian wings are for warmth?
I did not commit God of teh gaps or argument from silence,
the reason why there is ID in avian wings is precisely becaus they are "irreducibly complex" not that I am aguign against evolution at all. I haven't mentioned the evolution.
they don't
I would rather think it is a loss of function rather than the other way around.
Many of the things evolutionists propose are backwards.
why would God require repentance to save us, but not for us to"rescue those who sin against us."
you are not following the conversation.
here, remember when it was said that avian wings are for warmth? That was in relation to it being a case of begging the question regarding the use of wings. I changed it on them saying it was begging the question regarding the use of avian wings because it doesn't prove that wings were used for warmth in evolutionary opinion and not for flight. Then I mentioned it again, and now it's MY problem? I did not commit God of teh gaps or argument from silence, the reason why there is ID in avian wings is precisely becaus they are "irreducibly complex" not that I am aguign against evolution at all. I haven't mentioned the evolution.
I fail to see why you're even bringing up evolution when you're trying to prove design? It should be irrelevant.
Why would God require anything to save us if he's the all powerful designer of the universe?
We are told that it is ridiculous to even consider the idea that feathers could be used for insulation instead of flying. Why is it ridiculous when there are living species who use feathers for insulation and not for flying?
I would rather think it is a loss of function rather than the other way around.
Many of the things evolutionists propose are backwards.
you beg the question as to the designers motives.
the designer could have many purposes for feathers, more having to do with flight than anything else. I bet the feathers also insulate flying things too. What do you think of that?
yeah, I haven't looked into it much.
but they are right if it's not for flight it's for insulation, but both seem to be useful most of the time and they missed that part.
but you may be correct, they could have lost it.
I would never say that birds evolved feathers for insulation, as there are better insulators to evolve, it takes a preknowledge of flight which would have been impossible.
so we win the debate...
you are not following the conversation.
here, remember when it was said that avian wings are for warmth? That was in relation to it being a case of begging the question regarding the use of wings. I changed it on them saying it was begging the question regarding the use of avian wings because it doesn't prove that wings were used for warmth in evolutionary opinion and not for flight. Then I mentioned it again, and now it's MY problem? I did not commit God of teh gaps or argument from silence, the reason why there is ID in avian wings is precisely becaus they are "irreducibly complex" not that I am aguign against evolution at all. I haven't mentioned the evolution.
its so obvious that you missed it. IF every biological organism was designed versus evolved, you may simply be overlooking it. Now I have given you links, peer reviews, and no lunch theorums, if you don't like the info then thats your jibe. But I am not talking this any more with you.
why would God require repentance to save us, but not for us to"rescue those who sin against us."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?