Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for an earth much older than 6,000 years
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CabVet" data-source="post: 60795097" data-attributes="member: 297812"><p>No. I don't mean making love, I mean sex. "Making love" requires an emotion that cannot be observed in the fossils or petrified couples (and it doesn't require marriage either), so nobody is able to tell if they were "making love" because you can't observe emotion in a fossil. And a lot of the petrified scenes are from brothels in Pompeii, so I would hardly call paying a prostitute for sex "making love".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, "mating" is just the pairing between animals. In this case, if you analyze the fossil you will realize (just as the researchers did) there is more than just "mating" going on. Anyways, what is so wrong about calling it what it is? Sex?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The fossil fish is not from Pompeii, it is from a 50 million year old deposit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CabVet, post: 60795097, member: 297812"] No. I don't mean making love, I mean sex. "Making love" requires an emotion that cannot be observed in the fossils or petrified couples (and it doesn't require marriage either), so nobody is able to tell if they were "making love" because you can't observe emotion in a fossil. And a lot of the petrified scenes are from brothels in Pompeii, so I would hardly call paying a prostitute for sex "making love". No, "mating" is just the pairing between animals. In this case, if you analyze the fossil you will realize (just as the researchers did) there is more than just "mating" going on. Anyways, what is so wrong about calling it what it is? Sex? The fossil fish is not from Pompeii, it is from a 50 million year old deposit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evidence for an earth much older than 6,000 years
Top
Bottom