- Oct 2, 2011
- 6,061
- 2,231
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
R. C. Sproul said:
Everyone’s a Theologian: An Introduction to Systematic Theology (2014):
Furthermore, what is the operational definition of a good theologian? By what objective criteria did Sproul classify himself as a good theologian, and therefore not a bad one?
The title was probably a marketing trick to sell his book, like Physics for Dummies (2006). Obviously, not every dummy is a physicist
Agree.Theology is inescapable. Not everybody's a professional Theologian with a capital T.
I don't think so.But we are all theologians with a lowercase 't'
I wouldn't define theologian so lightly and loosely. It cheapens the seriousness of the concept.because we all have some view of who God is.
Everyone’s a Theologian: An Introduction to Systematic Theology (2014):
By claiming that everyone is a theologian, the overgeneralization risks diluting the meaning of theology, which traditionally involves the systematic and intentional study of divine matters. Encouraging people to grow in their theological understanding, rather than labeling them as already theologians, might be a more constructive way to approach the subject.There is no one who is not a theologian. Everyone has an idea about God, and everyone has an opinion about God. The question is not whether we are theologians, but whether we are good theologians.
Furthermore, what is the operational definition of a good theologian? By what objective criteria did Sproul classify himself as a good theologian, and therefore not a bad one?
The title was probably a marketing trick to sell his book, like Physics for Dummies (2006). Obviously, not every dummy is a physicist
Last edited: