Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Ever the Expert
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ledifni" data-source="post: 10938784" data-attributes="member: 94562"><p>Yes, of course I would. I would be delighted to see evidence for creationism -- after all, I've been asking for it ever since I left the creationist camp for lack of evidence. If the creationists want me back, they need to show evidence.</p><p> </p><p> However, OnceDeceived, I believe that you and I are talking about two different things. When I say "evidence," I'm not asking for this or that or the other objection to some kind of evidence for evolution. I'm asking for a very simple thing -- scientific experiments demonstrating successful predictions made by a coherent creation theory, where those predictions could not have been made by evolutionary theory. This is the evidence demanded by the scientific method, and it is the only type of evidence I will accept for either evolution or creation.</p><p> </p><p> Reams of solid scientific evidence of this type exists for evolution. Not one paragraph of solid scientific evidence has ever been submitted by <em>any</em> creation scientist in support of that theory. There has been much sophistry but no science. If you wish to convince scientists, you are going to have to bite the bullet and do science.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ledifni, post: 10938784, member: 94562"] Yes, of course I would. I would be delighted to see evidence for creationism -- after all, I've been asking for it ever since I left the creationist camp for lack of evidence. If the creationists want me back, they need to show evidence. However, OnceDeceived, I believe that you and I are talking about two different things. When I say "evidence," I'm not asking for this or that or the other objection to some kind of evidence for evolution. I'm asking for a very simple thing -- scientific experiments demonstrating successful predictions made by a coherent creation theory, where those predictions could not have been made by evolutionary theory. This is the evidence demanded by the scientific method, and it is the only type of evidence I will accept for either evolution or creation. Reams of solid scientific evidence of this type exists for evolution. Not one paragraph of solid scientific evidence has ever been submitted by [i]any[/i] creation scientist in support of that theory. There has been much sophistry but no science. If you wish to convince scientists, you are going to have to bite the bullet and do science. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Ever the Expert
Top
Bottom