A
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Antman_05 said:Just asking when you guys are talking to people about Christ, do you give them a chose to repent, as in do you say "would you like to accept Jesus as your Lord and Savor." just asking i know what i do but i would like to know what you guys do.
JJB said:Then ask them "Who do you think Jesus is?" Listen to answer. Maybe discuss that some more.
mannysee said:well, the short story is, i became a christian because God drew me to Christ (picking up the bible and not understanding it/ fearing some things i read about, meeting a christian, reading a couple of Little's books, meeting the same guy in another city, basically saying to him "what must i do to become a christian?"), i held off for a short time (thinking about it), but i couldn't resist him in the end. This happened 12 years ago.
We should not be held back by the thought that if they are not elect, they will not believe us, and our efforts to convert them will fail. That is true; but it is none of our business, and should make no difference to our action. In the first place, it is always wrong to abstain from doing good for fear that it might not be appreciated. In the second place, the non-elect in this world are faceless men as far as we are concerned. We know that they exist, but we do not and cannot know who they are, and it is as futile as it is impious for us to try and guess. The identity of the reprobate is one of Gods secret things into which His people may not pry. In the third place, our calling as Christians is not to love Gods elect, and them only, but to love our neighbour, irrespective of whether he is elect or not. Now, the nature of love is to do good and to relieve need. If, then, our neighbour is unconverted, we are to show love to him as best we can by seeking to share with him the good news without which he must needs perish. So we find Paul warning and teaching every man:[Col. i.28] not merely because he was an apostle, but because every man was his neighbour. And the measure of the urgency of our evangelistic task is the greatness of our neighbours need and the immediacy of his danger.
Some fear that belief in the sovereign grace of God leads to the conclusion that evangelism is pointless, since God will save His elect anyway, whether they hear the gospel or not. This, as we have seen, is a false conclusion based on a false assumption. But now we must go further, and point out that the truth is just the opposite. So far from making evangelism pointless, the sovereignty of God in grace is the one thing that prevents evangelism from being pointless. For it creates the possibilityindeed, the certaintythat evangelism will be fruitful. Apart from it, there is not even a possibility of evangelism being fruitful. Were it not for the sovereign grace of God, evangelism would be the most futile and useless enterprise that the world has ever seen, and there would be no more complete waste of time under the sun than to preach the Christian gospel.
Why is this? Because of the spiritual inability of man in sin. Let Paul, the greatest of all evangelists, explain this to us.
Fallen man, says Paul, has a blinded mind, and so is unable to grasp spiritual truth. The natural (unspiritual, unregenerate) man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.[1Cor ii.14] Again, he has a perverse and ungodly nature. The carnal mind (the mind of the unregenerate man) is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. The consequence? So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.[Rom viii.7 f.] In both these passages Paul makes two distinct statements about fallen man in relation to Gods truth, and the progression of thought is parallel in both cases. First Paul asserts unregenerate mans failure, as a matter of fact. He receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; he is not subject to the law of God. But then Paul goes on to interpret his first statement by a second, to the effect that this failure is a necessity of nature, some- thing certain and inevitable and universal and unalterable, just because it is not in man to do other- wise than fail in this way. Neither can he know them. Neither indeed can be. Man in Adam has not got it in him to apprehend spiritual realities, or to obey Gods law from his heart. Enmity against God, leading to defection from God, is the law of his nature. It is, so to speak, instinctive to him to suppress and evade and deny Gods truth, and to shrug off Gods authority and to flout Gods lawyes, and when he hears the gospel to disbelieve and disobey that too. This is the sort of person that he is. He is, says Paul, dead in trespasses and sins[Eph ii.1]wholly incapacitated for any positive reaction to Gods Word, deaf to Gods speech, blind to Gods revelation, impervious to Gods inducements. If you talk to a corpse, there is no response; the man is dead. When Gods Word is spoken to sinners, there is equally no response; they are dead in trespasses and sins.
Nor is this all. Paul also tells us that Satan (whose power and ill will he never underestimates) is constantly active to keep sinners in their natural state. Satan now worketh in the children of disobedience[Eph ii.2] to ensure that they do not obey Gods law. And the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ . . . should shine unto them.[2Cor iv.4] So that there are two obstacles in the way of successful evangelism: the first, mans natural and irresistible impulse to oppose God, and the second, Satans assiduity in shepherding man in the ways of unbelief and disobedience.
What does this mean for evangelism? It means, quite simply, that evangelism, described as we have described it, cannot possibly succeed. However clear and cogent we may be in presenting the gospel, we have no hope of convincing or converting anyone. Can you or I by our earnest talking break the power of Satan over a mans life? No. Can you or I give life to the spiritually dead? No. Can we hope to convince sinners of the truth of the gospel by patient explanation? No. Can we hope to move men to obey the gospel by any words of entreaty that we may utter? No. Our approach to evangelism is not realistic till we have faced this shattering fact, and let it make its proper impact on us. When a schoolmaster is trying to teach children arithmetic, or grammar, and finds them slow to learn, he assures himself that the penny must drop sooner or later, and so encourages himself to keep on trying. We can most of us muster great reserves of patience if we think that there is some prospect of ultimate success in what we are attempting. But in the case of evangelism there is no such prospect. Regarded as a human enterprise, evangelism is a hopeless task. It cannot in principle produce the desired effect. We can preach, and preach clearly and fluently and attractively; we can talk to individuals in the most pointed and challenging way; we can organize special services, and distribute tracts, and put up posters, and flood the country with publicityand there is not the slightest prospect that all this outlay of effort will bring a single soul home to God. Unless there is some other factor in the situation, over and above our own endeavours, all evangelistic action is foredoomed to failure. This is the fact, the brute, rock-bottom fact, that we have to face.
PentecostalEvangelist said:Of course a gift can be given, and yet NOT be accepted, just because a gift is not received does not mean it was never given, that is a very ridiculous assumption on your part
God GAVE his son Jesus as a gift to the world for the assuarance of salvation for the entire world BUT the entire world has NOT yet accepted that gift, just becasue all of man kind has not yet made the choice to accept that gift certainly does not mean Gods gift of his son Jesus was never given.
I know you hate me, and you think I'm a stupid bafoon Ricky boy, and I may just be exactly that in your eyes, BUT stupid bafoon or not, I have enough common sense in me to know you are stone cold dead wrong on this one pal.....
PentecostalEvangelist said:I'm sorry, I certainly should have realized of course that no matter what I do I will always be wrong, that has been Gods pre set plan for my life.
BTW As you can clearly see I changed the reply to RickOtto to state that he is always right and I am always wrong, so as to better satisify everyone concerned...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?