Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
thanks for the input. I am not partial to the term progressive to much baggage. it mean anythinge from those who mildly disagree, tho those who are full blown humanist. to vague and nebulas. i favor Evanglica, but I have to disagree eith th fundementalist association. When I think of evanglical I think of those seeking a perosnal relationship with God and the need to be born again. I thin it is a good way to still emphaisize the protastant Mllerite connection.Sound like a good idea, if you have visited Adventist blogs (you can find a good list on my blog ) http://cafesda.blogspot.com/
you will see that the majority are actually progressive Adventists so there is a good representation there. But another discussion forum would be useful.
I don't like the term Evangelical anymore as it is often equivalent to Fundamentalist in today's world and it also carries a connotation that only the penal/substitutionary atonement is the only possible view.
I would guess that the reason the Progressive SDA forum here gets less use is because most progressive are more troubled by the restrictive views of the Traditional so they get the most attention in the topics. For instance the progressives SDA's are not going to get all excited about did Jesus have a prefall or post fall nature. It is a non issue. The sabbath is more important for the restoration of people then for what day someone finds their rest. So it is not a big issue in the main, certainly not compared to the attention the sabbath gets whenever mentioned on the Traditional forums. The emphasis between the progressive and the traditional is really quite different.
Sound like a good idea, if you have visited Adventist blogs (you can find a good list on my blog ) http://cafesda.blogspot.com/
you will see that the majority are actually progressive Adventists so there is a good representation there. But another discussion forum would be useful.
I don't like the term Evangelical anymore as it is often equivalent to Fundamentalist in today's world and it also carries a connotation that only the penal/substitutionary atonement is the only possible view.
I would guess that the reason the Progressive SDA forum here gets less use is because most progressive are more troubled by the restrictive views of the Traditional so they get the most attention in the topics. For instance the progressives SDA's are not going to get all excited about did Jesus have a prefall or post fall nature. It is a non issue. The sabbath is more important for the restoration of people then for what day someone finds their rest. So it is not a big issue in the main, certainly not compared to the attention the sabbath gets whenever mentioned on the Traditional forums. The emphasis between the progressive and the traditional is really quite different.
Sophia& do you think we should start a new chruch?
How about a website?
It is also very much dependent upon the pastor. My daughter was baptized maybe 5 years ago and he did not ever give her the baptizmal vows. He is a very good guy. He also made the whole service about her baptism, she chose the songs etc. It was really nice for her and something I wish more pastors would consider.
what baptizimal vows would suggest and support?
You are absolutely right.I would like to see them simplified and not so Adventist-specific. However, I realize that that will never happen because the church wants to baptize people into the denomination and not just into Christ.
No i don't know about that I am aware of the term pphb., but thats it, the idea is in it's infancy.Icedragon, do have familarity with some of the discussion forum software. How much website space or traffic allowance the forum would need etc.
i don't know what to do, to start and I don't how much time it takes, i really don't want to do it alone. i think i need a team of about 5 to start Ideally I'd like 10, but 5 i think would do it.Well, icedragon, definately let us know when the idea grows!
My husband doesn't ask people if they accept all of the vows when he baptizes them. He especially doesn't make them answer each question publicly, as I've seen in some churches. Sometimes he will have them give a testimony about how they met Jesus, if they feel comfortable sharing it.
Icedragon, do have familarity with some of the discussion forum software. How much website space or traffic allowance the forum would need etc.
Actually this is not trueMakes me wonder whether you have been paying attention!
If they are willing they do a testimony. But I have read the vows publicly a number of times and have them agree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?