What does it mean to be "the foundation of justice"? And why do you call it "God's justice"? Are there different kinds of justice?I am saying that God is the foundation of justice. So "unjust" simply means "a violation of God's justice". God cannot logically be unjust. Just like there cannot be a square circle.
Apart from that time he sent the bears to kill the kids. Unless killing those is is a subset of good.Happily, he always meets that standard.
If you cannot judge something, then you know nothing about it. This is not to use the word judging in the sense of sentencing or condemning, but simply in the sense of forming an opinion about something - as in, "I judge her to be a good person."If we are speaking in meta-ethical terms and not colloquially, then it makes no sense to ask what makes God good. He is the standard by which everything else is judged. He cannot be judged at all.
Sure. But the problem is, your standard is tautological. It is saying that "God's character is God's character," and therefore cannot be used to make a judgement of any kind at all. As a measuring stick, it is useless.We can understand this by way of analogy. Everyone has in mind an absolute standard when making moral judgments. It’s necessary in order to make moral judgments. An absolute standard is one that cannot be evaluated at a higher level.
But this doesn't help you. You're the one who claimed that you could answer Euthyphro's Dilemma. Counter-claiming that others do not have a reliable foundation for their morality either doesn't help your case.For some, the absolute standard is something like “human well being.” If this is the standard, then a question like: “how do we know that human well being is good?” doesn’t make any sense to ask. “Human well being” is the standard by which we measure everything else. It cannot itself be judged. So it is with my view on God’s nature.
Hence, the specific regulatory set provisions, as laid forth for slavery, women's rights, homosexuality, infanticide, genocide, and others, are indeed absolute; as they are laid forth in Scripture.
I agree. What makes him good? God does not have to be good to have the properties you describe. What makes him good?
What would be the purpose of creating a being with no free will ? God is not a puppet master. He desires to have a relationship with us. This is how it was from the beginning. He walked with Adam until he fell from grace. Jesus Christ of Nazareth restored grace, the Holy Spirit, once lost through Adam. We still have free will but now we have an advocate who once again walks with us daily.Why create beings with “free will” if that is the exact thing that causes all of this “corruption”?
His standards can be judged by mine. My standard of well being is the the best standard for morals in my opinion. Gods morals do not always advance my moral goal of well being for all.If we are speaking in meta-ethical terms and not colloquially, then it makes no sense to ask what makes God good. He is the standard by which everything else is judged. He cannot be judged at all.
no, we must ask if our moral standards are good. If I find a better standard than well being I will change to that. If I never question my standard how can I improve it!We can understand this by way of analogy. Everyone has in mind an absolute standard when making moral judgments. It’s necessary in order to make moral judgments. An absolute standard is one that cannot be evaluated at a higher level. For some, the absolute standard is something like “human well being.” If this is the standard, then a question like: “how do we know that human well being is good?” doesn’t make any sense to ask. “Human well being” is the standard by which we measure everything else. It cannot itself be judged. So it is with my view on God’s nature.
just because we don’t have all the answers does not mean we should not have a moral standard. When you can show that gods moral standard is better than well being for all then I will change my standard. My standard does not allow for slavery, genocide, killing of children etc. in the situations that god allows them. When you can show god exists and his moral standard is better than mine then I will adopt gods moral system.How is it that any of us can objectively ask "what makes God good"?
If we each just take a moment to think about our limited situation in this Reality we all live it, we have to admit to ourselves that our OWN views on morality and our respective choice of an ethical system involves what we each think makes-up "the value of the Good." And in this daily process of human evaluation, we find that our own moral views are mostly subjective with only the thinnest slices of common objectivity running through them.
And if this is true, we all need to take a step back in reconsideration so as to avoid being too assured of our own moral views, even those that we think apply to the Biblical concept of God.
He does not want a relationship. He wants worship. What if I told my wife be in a relationship with me or you will die? Is that a loving relationship? Why not just me a good and loving god and show us this, then most would decide to be in a relationship.What would be the purpose of creating a being with no free will ? God is not a puppet master. He desires to have a relationship with us. This is how it was from the beginning. He walked with Adam until he fell from grace. Jesus Christ of Nazareth restored grace, the Holy Spirit, once lost through Adam. We still have free will but now we have an advocate who once again walks with us daily.
Not sure how you can come to that conclusion considering your position. Thanks for engaging.He does not want a relationship. He wants worship. What if I told my wife be in a relationship with me or you will die? Is that a loving relationship? Why not just me a good and loving god and show us this, then most would decide to be in a relationship.
I come to that conclusion by reading and studying the Bible. I understand why you want to dismiss me and not talk about it.Not sure how you can come to that conclusion considering your position. Thanks for engaging.
just because we don’t have all the answers does not mean we should not have a moral standard. When you can show that gods moral standard is better than well being for all then I will change my standard. My standard does not allow for slavery, genocide, killing of children etc. in the situations that god allows them. When you can show god exists and his moral standard is better than mine then I will adopt gods moral system.
Thank you for understanding. Blessings.I come to that conclusion by reading and studying the Bible. I understand why you want to dismiss me and not talk about it.
I never thought you did ask me. The fact is I want the best moral standard there is. If you’d is better than mine then I will want to change my standard.I didn't asked you to change your standard, did I? My personal standard doesn't allow for slavery, genocide, killing of children, etc. either. Nor does my personal standard allow for racism, eugenics, nor abortion for that matter.
Besides, I'd think that anyone who likes the song, "After Forever" can't be all bad anyway.
I never thought you did ask me. The fact is I want the best moral standard there is. If you’d is better than mine then I will want to change my standard.
Your moral standard then is not derived from god of the Bible? FYI, my morals do not allow for racism, eugenics or abortion either.
Then why is maximizing well being for all not the best standard for morality?No, my 'moral standard' in informed by---rather than derived from---the Bible. And my moral standard, as much as it has continued to grow, expand, become clarified and educated over the last three decades, isn't going to necessarily match that of other Christians (or even Secular Humanist for that matter) simply because I'm ... a Christian.
And the World can just attempt to deal with that as I turn over each of its respective attempts to create, denote and articulate morality for everyone else !
The notion of "well being" is all fine and dandy, and it may be a good place to start in our mutual consideration of what could make for human flourishing, but problems arise in teasing out the semantics and to what those semantics express about certain notions that may or may not function in human social reality.Then why is maximizing well being for all not the best standard for morality?
It's simply one source that plays a role in my overall, ongoing educational process of discerning what may be actually socially and psychologically functional in human society.how does the Bible inform your morality?
What are the problems?The notion of "well being" is all fine and dandy, and it may be a good place to start in out consideration of what could make for human flourishing, but problems arise in teasing out the semantics and to what those semantics express certain notions that may or may not function in human social reality.
Then how do you determine what is moral in a situation? How have you determined that slavery in wrong for example?It's simply one source that plays a role in my overall, ongoing educational process of discerning what may be actually socially and psychologically functional in human society.
Since the bible doesn't address every moral situation or dilemma known to man that any one human being may encounter in life, then we'll need other sources by which to consider and reconsider what is 'truly best and real' on a social level. This is one reason we human beings have developed diverse disciplinary studies like Business Ethics and Bio-medical Ethics within the field of Ethics and Moral studies, along with other fields of study like Philosophy of Law.
As a Philosopher, I'm going to do my best to be up on, or ready to learn about, moral issues that affect any one of us, and as a person who values Christianity, the essential moral values of Jesus Christ will inform, temper and direct my ongoing moral decisions.
What are the problems?
There isn't a formula for 'figuring out' that any one situation or social problem is right or wrong. But in the case of slavery, it was fairly easy to come to an understand that owning and abusing another person is not only a cruel thing to do, but also one that doesn't lend itself to functional and healthy social lives among our fellow human beings.Then how do you determine what is moral in a situation? How have you determined that slavery in wrong for example?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?