• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Eusebius of Caesarea

buzuxi02

Veteran
May 14, 2006
8,608
2,514
New York
✟219,964.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
There is really nothing wrong with Eusebius works. He is not a saint of the EO as Andrew has said. He accepted the council of Nicea, but not neccesarily for what it taught, instead it was accepted for rejecting the extreme form of arianism. The extreme form of Arianism was the belief; "that there was a time when Christ was not". After Nicea, arians were not a monolithic group, there were divided into a few different factions, and some never considered themselves arians. Eusebius was one of these semi-arians. These semi-arian groups tended to reject the term homoousios, and many had personality clashes with St Athanasios.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

All4Christ

✙ The Handmaid of God Laura ✙
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Mar 11, 2003
11,796
8,174
PA
Visit site
✟1,183,096.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Personally, I've never read his works for their spiritual content - but it does have a wealth of history that is very important. Also - if people are willing to use other sources as a history - even Jewish or secular - even if Eusebius was not fully Orthodox in belief - it is possible that it still might be helpful for certain specific circumstances. Beyond that - I'll let the others answer - I still am learning so much myself!
 
Upvote 0

Macarius

Progressive Orthodox Christian
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2007
3,263
771
The Ivory Tower
✟74,622.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
His history of the Church has tremendous use as an historical witness to the early church, and much of what it says is useful to the Orthodox. However, he is not a saint and his writings do not carry the same weight as a saint's writings would.
 
Upvote 0