Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Europe's New Security Architecture
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dqhall" data-source="post: 76561335" data-attributes="member: 379119"><p>There were a few fracking accidents. The benefits outweigh the risks. Water aquifers in fracked areas are usable, else fracking would have been shut down.</p><p></p><p>California tried fracking. They discovered shale rock there was already fractured by earthquakes. Fracking was not economical there, development ceased.</p><p></p><p>Canada and Argentina are fracking. Columbia wants to test a frack well. Saudi Arabia is testing fracking for natural gas extraction. Algeria has natural gas shale that is not being developed. They are hostile to outsiders. Mexico has oil and gas in shale. They are against fracking.</p><p></p><p>It took years for the U.S. to develop natural gas import facilities that turned the LNG to gas and connect it to pipelines. As the U.S. energy crisis was lessened by new shale gas and oil supplies, they started to build LNG export facilities. They chilled and compressed the gas to make liquid natural gas. Special tankers transport LNG to specially equipped ports connected to pipelines. It takes years to do these things. There are manpower shortages at this time.</p><p></p><p>Nuclear reactors are being built again in various nations. A smaller safer reactor design is sought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dqhall, post: 76561335, member: 379119"] There were a few fracking accidents. The benefits outweigh the risks. Water aquifers in fracked areas are usable, else fracking would have been shut down. California tried fracking. They discovered shale rock there was already fractured by earthquakes. Fracking was not economical there, development ceased. Canada and Argentina are fracking. Columbia wants to test a frack well. Saudi Arabia is testing fracking for natural gas extraction. Algeria has natural gas shale that is not being developed. They are hostile to outsiders. Mexico has oil and gas in shale. They are against fracking. It took years for the U.S. to develop natural gas import facilities that turned the LNG to gas and connect it to pipelines. As the U.S. energy crisis was lessened by new shale gas and oil supplies, they started to build LNG export facilities. They chilled and compressed the gas to make liquid natural gas. Special tankers transport LNG to specially equipped ports connected to pipelines. It takes years to do these things. There are manpower shortages at this time. Nuclear reactors are being built again in various nations. A smaller safer reactor design is sought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Europe's New Security Architecture
Top
Bottom