- May 17, 2011
- 11,460
- 4,691
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I'm sure we've all talked about this before in some detail, but I came across this early and it really ruffled my feathers and made me scratch my head in confusion. This statement is from someone supporting eternal security and it seems almost to contradict itself and I'll explain my view. Here it is:
One must persevere in faith to be saved.; True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is Gods gift.; Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.; Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with.; God will preserve true believers and they will be saved.
The first statement "One must persevere in faith to be saved." places the responsibility of perseverance on the believer (One must persevere). The last statement "God will preserve true believers and they will be saved." places it on God (God will preserve) That is a contradiction, is it not?
True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. If one MUST persevere in the faith to be saved, how can this statement be true. Either you have to persevere to be saved, or you can not lose your faith PERIOD (perseverance or no). This is a contradiction.
Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with. In order to lose something a person has to have it first right? I can not lose my marbles (no laughing) if I never had them to begin with. I can not lose my car keys without first having car keys to lose. Simple facts of life, you must have something in order to lose it. So this statement just contradicts itself. Not to mention the previous statement of True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. would seem to contradict this point's specific statement in that if "true believers" can't lose their faith, they have had faith at one point. Thus, those who lose their faith can be true believers because true believers have faith at some time. (I hope that made sense)
That original 5 point statement is from a Baptist brother of mine summarizing Classic Calvinism which is what he used to defend Eternal Security. I have not even listed my point for defending conditional security, but what are your thoughts?
One must persevere in faith to be saved.; True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is Gods gift.; Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.; Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with.; God will preserve true believers and they will be saved.
The first statement "One must persevere in faith to be saved." places the responsibility of perseverance on the believer (One must persevere). The last statement "God will preserve true believers and they will be saved." places it on God (God will preserve) That is a contradiction, is it not?
True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. If one MUST persevere in the faith to be saved, how can this statement be true. Either you have to persevere to be saved, or you can not lose your faith PERIOD (perseverance or no). This is a contradiction.
Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with. In order to lose something a person has to have it first right? I can not lose my marbles (no laughing) if I never had them to begin with. I can not lose my car keys without first having car keys to lose. Simple facts of life, you must have something in order to lose it. So this statement just contradicts itself. Not to mention the previous statement of True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. would seem to contradict this point's specific statement in that if "true believers" can't lose their faith, they have had faith at one point. Thus, those who lose their faith can be true believers because true believers have faith at some time. (I hope that made sense)
That original 5 point statement is from a Baptist brother of mine summarizing Classic Calvinism which is what he used to defend Eternal Security. I have not even listed my point for defending conditional security, but what are your thoughts?