• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

student ad x

Senior Contributor
Feb 20, 2009
9,837
805
just outside the forrest
✟36,577.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If faith is the conduit (starting from God and reaching to us experientially), it's going to be difficult to justify from Scripture consistently that justification is without human responsibility to respond to God's call. The eternal view (without careful, careful clarification) seems to deny the solas and becomes tilted toward the hyper view IMHO.
 
Reactions: AMR
Upvote 0

student ad x

Senior Contributor
Feb 20, 2009
9,837
805
just outside the forrest
✟36,577.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Westminster XI

IV. God did, from all eternity, decree to justify the elect; and Christ did, in the fullness of time, die for their sins and rise again for their justification; nevertheless they are not justified until the Holy Spirit doth, in due time, actually apply Christ unto them.

LBCF 1689 XI


IV. From all eternity God decreed to justify all the elect, and Christ, in the fullness of time, died for their sins, and rose again for their justification. Nevertheless, they are not personally justified until the Holy Spirit, in due time, actually applies Christ to them.

Galatians 3:8; 1 Peter 1:2; 1 Timothy 2:6; Romans 4:25; Colossians 1:21,22; Titus 3:4-7
 
Last edited:
Reactions: AMR
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
God also decreed the salvation of the elect, but that didn't mean they were saved from the foundation of the world.

A decree is accomplished through means. When the means are creational, the decree becomes a process; an account can be built whereby the decree is accomplished.

Therefore Paul could say:

And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

and also

Therefore, since we have been justified by faith ...

The decree is from eternity. The decree is accomplished in time.
 
Reactions: student ad x
Upvote 0
R

RefCath

Guest
The 1905 Synod of Utrecht declared:

that the term [eternal justification] itself does not occur in the Confessional Standards but that it is not for this reason to be disapproved, any more than we would be justified in disapproving the term Covenant of Works and similar terms which have been adopted through theological usage;

that it is incorrect to say that our Confessional Standards know only of a justification by and through faith, since both Gods' Word (Rom. 4:25) and our Confession (Article XX) speak explicitly of an objective justification sealed by the resurrection of Christ, which in point of time precedes the subjective justification;

that, moreover, as far as the matter itself is concerned, all our churches sincerely believe and confess that Christ from eternity in the Counsel of Peace undertook to be the Surety of His people; taking their guilt upon Himself as also that afterward He by His suffering and death on Calvary actually paid the ransom for us, reconciling us to God while were yet enemies; but that on the basis of God's Word and in harmony with our Confession it must be maintained with equal firmness that we personally become partakers of this benefit only by a sincere faith.

Wherefore Synod earnestly warns against any view that would do violence either to Christ's eternal suretyship for his elect, or to the requirement of a sincere faith to be justified before God in the tribunal of conscience.
 
Upvote 0

BrotherBob

Zealot
Mar 6, 2010
400
47
Hornitos, California
✟23,261.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

"God did, from all eternity, decree to justify all the elect, and Christ
did, in the fullness of time, die for their sins, and rise again for their
justification: nevertheless, they are not justified, until the Holy Spirit
doth, in due time, actually apply Christ unto them."-John Calvin
 
Upvote 0

the particular baptist

pactum serva
Nov 14, 2008
1,883
235
Currently reside in Knoxville, TN
Visit site
✟18,268.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

1689 LBCF, consider :

"Those whom God effectually calls, he also freely justifies,1 not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous;2 not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone;3 not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness by faith,4 which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God.5"

1 Rom. 3:24, 8:30
2 Rom. 4:5-8, Eph. 1:7
3 1 Cor. 1:30,31, Rom. 5:17-19
4 Phil. 3:8,9; Eph. 2:8-10
5 John 1:12, Rom. 5:17

More justification by Christ Alone and less justification by faith alone.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: JM
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
63
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟115,334.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I agree.

To say one is "justified" from eternity past, is to run the gambet of hyper-calvinism as one such well known member of the Soteriology area espouses. Example:

the elect of God are Justified before God by the blood of Christ [rom 5:9] or the obedience of Christ the one [ phil 2:8, rom 5:19] and this before they actually existed or had any being !

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Reactions: AMR
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,478
3,738
Canada
✟882,646.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
From a comment made on my blog:
I fail to see how it can consistently be held to be “forensic” as Reformed theology has taught, and not be “eternal” in God’s perspective (which is all that matters!). It is either a decree in the high court of heaven pronounced by the Sovereign ruler of all or it is not. If not, It ends up being temporal and experiential, and is taught as such by so many that there is no wonder that 1) it so often gets confused with sanctification, and 2) that progressive justification (a Romish error) is now creeping into evangelical circles. The timing of imputation (double) is also an essential issue in this debate, or at least it ought to be! It is in these two areas:

1) the forensic, decreetal nature of justification, and

2) the placement of its constituent elements (double imputation) in salvation history, where there is inconsistency on the part of the majority of the Reformed in their thinking on this doctrine. I suspect that most are prejudiced against it “out of the gate” due to the guilt by association with the labels “hyper-Calvinism” and “antinomianism”. This is unfortunate, but the baggage is so deep seated now that it is hard to get this debate off on the right foot in most circles. Hopefully exposure to Hupton will gain a reading on the Biblical merits of the case, and some will be led “back to the drawing board” on this issue. One can only hope!​
If a King gives a condemned man a pardon but the pardon doesn’t reach the condemned man for a few days, or even months, when does the pardon actually take place? Does the pardon depend on the decree from the King to pardon or the condemned man’s apprehension of it? Just a thought.

A God that doesn’t change His mind… « Feileadh Mor

Some objections to justification from eternity answered here by Job Hupton.

Object. 6th. “The apostle Paul does not say whom he justified them he also called, but whom he called them he also justified. Rom. viii. 30.”

This objection is founded upon a notion that the Sovereign Disposer of all things has, in his wise and wonderful counsel, arranged spiritual blessings exactly in the same order in which they are mentioned in the revelation of them. But this notion cannot be right; because the holy scriptures do not always mention the same things, in the same order ; and therefore, not always in the order in which they stand, in the divine economy, in which there can be no variation. In Rom. viii. 29, 30, predestination, the same with election, is mentioned before calling; but in 1 Peter i. 10, and again in Rev. xvii. 14, calling stands in order before election ; yet nothing is more evident than, the priority of election to calling : the former took place in eternity, the latter takes place in time ; and, indeed, the above notion, if admitted, will effectually confute your favorite opinion, and establish justification before faith ; for we are told, that God bath saved us, and called us. Here salvation is mentioned before calling, and you know that, as there is no faith without calling, so there is no salvation without justification. Though the apostle in the place referred to, does say, ,whom he called them he also justified,” nothing can be concluded from his words, hostile to eternal justification ; for the construction of them does not make it necessary, to understand him as speaking of justification, as subsequent to calling, though, perhaps, the connexion in which they stand does ; therefore, it is best to interpret them as meaning justification in the conscience, which takes place when we believe, and is perfectly consistent with eternal justification in Christ: for the former is, in fact, nothing but the latter shining into the heart, in the rays of the gospel, and the beams of the divine Spirit. [end quote]

Being called a hyper isn't as bad as you might think. I evangelize. I pass out tracts, etc. I've even gone door to door and given away free Gospel of John and Romans...I'm a hyper alright.



jm
PS: I know Dean wasn't talking about me I almost never visit the soteriology forum.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
63
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟115,334.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
PS: I know Dean wasn't talking about me I almost never visit the soteriology forum.

No, I wasn't.

Let me re-phrase.


The Doctrine of Justification, Restated and Reviewed, Author: Me

Chist has died for the sins of the whole world, but if you do not take advantage of Christ's death, then you are not justified. And you are not justified until you take advantage of it.

You are "elect" from eternity past, but because you are numbered among the elect does not make one justified from eternity past.

Being declared righteous, or justified is a judical act which is only pronounced by God. (Rom. 8:33)

And that only happens after the Christ event in our lives.

If you were "justified" from eternity past, then you would have no need for a Savior. As stated previously:


Ibid.

While you may be the "elect" from eternity past, you cannot, and you will not ever be declared "righteous" or "justified" until the very moment Christ's precious shed blood is applied to us.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Reactions: cygnusx1
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,478
3,738
Canada
✟882,646.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,478
3,738
Canada
✟882,646.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Justification through faith is not duty-faith. It does not institute a faith-for-wages system.

It is kind of interesting to me that a theology is being written as antithesis to bad theology.

Aside: is this theology saying that the Lamb was actually slain before the foundation of the world? Because if not, then Jesus' justification of others would not happen until the Crucifixion, and would not manifest itself until after the Resurrection ...? Is that the position of eternal justification?

(Aside, if someone's going to assert my position I'd appreciate it if you'd refer to my position posted earlier and don't "do a 180" to try to allege what I believe.)
 
Reactions: student ad x
Upvote 0