Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Entropy disproves Darwin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ondaball" data-source="post: 40824061"><p>Every time, in the past 6.25 years on different 'Net forums, that I start a thread @ this, some idiot always says that babies disprove it</p><p> </p><p>Babies are NOT left alone - they are fed, watered, changed, washed etc etc</p><p> </p><p><strong>Each species of life was Designer-made by the Most Briliant Brain in the Universe</strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><em>So here's details to explain to your teachers & lecturers, on Monday, why true education is academic freedom of thought, not atheistic brainwashing</em></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><a href="http://progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=85" target="_blank"><span style="color: #506aa8">ProgettoCosmo - Thermodynamics <strong>disproves Darwin</strong></span></a></strong></p><p> </p><p>[SIZE=-1]That contradicts <strong>entropy</strong>. Moreover Neo-<strong>Darwinism</strong> pretends species evolves <strong>.....</strong> until arriving to quantum particles and events for <strong>disproving</strong> neo-<strong>Darwinism</strong>. <strong>...</strong>[/SIZE]</p><p> </p><p>Evolutionary theory has two major claims. First it supports the hypothesis of abiogenesis (origin of life from matter alone); secondly it supports the hypothesis of Darwinian macroevolution (transformation of all species from a common ancestry), via random mutation and natural selection. <strong>We will try to explain simply how laws of thermodynamics and entropy deny these major claims of evolutionary theory</strong>...</p><p> </p><p>[SIZE=-1]<span style="color: #f07005">progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=85 - </span><a href="http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&safe=active&client=pub-8808028116415421&channel=9935310537&cof=FORID:1%3BGL:1%3BS:http://foru.ms%3BL:http://www3.foru.ms/images/misc/hdr_map3.jpg%3BLH:50%3BLW:468%3BLBGC:FF9900%3BBGC:%23f6f9fd%3BLC:%23506aa8%3BVLC:%23f07005%3BGALT:%23F07005%3BGFNT:%23666666%3BGIMP:%23666666%3B&domains=Foru.ms&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=related:progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php%3Foption%3Dcontent%26task%3Dview%26id%3D85" target="_blank"><span style="color: #666666">Similar pages</span></a>[/SIZE]</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong><a href="http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #506aa8">BrothersJudd Blog: SOME LIKE IT HOT (via Tom Corcoran):</span></a></strong></p><p> </p><p>[SIZE=-1]<strong>Darwinism</strong>, on the other hand, has to be consistent with it [<strong>entropy</strong>] and isn't. <strong>...</strong> the fact that order arises in violation of <strong>entropy disproves </strong><strong>...</strong>[/SIZE]</p><p> </p><p>It is a well-known prediction of the second law that, in a closed system, every type of order is unstable and must eventually decrease, as everything tends toward more probable (more random) states. Not only will carbon and temperature distributions become more disordered (more uniform), but the performance of all electronic devices will deteriorate, not improve. <strong>Natural forces, such as corrosion, erosion, fire and explosions, do not create order, they destroy it...</strong></p><p> </p><p>[SIZE=-1]<span style="color: #f07005">brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html - </span><a href="http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&safe=active&client=pub-8808028116415421&channel=9935310537&cof=FORID:1%3BGL:1%3BS:http://foru.ms%3BL:http://www3.foru.ms/images/misc/hdr_map3.jpg%3BLH:50%3BLW:468%3BLBGC:FF9900%3BBGC:%23f6f9fd%3BLC:%23506aa8%3BVLC:%23f07005%3BGALT:%23F07005%3BGFNT:%23666666%3BGIMP:%23666666%3B&domains=Foru.ms&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=related:brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #666666">Similar pages</span></a>[/SIZE]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ondaball, post: 40824061"] Every time, in the past 6.25 years on different 'Net forums, that I start a thread @ this, some idiot always says that babies disprove it Babies are NOT left alone - they are fed, watered, changed, washed etc etc [B]Each species of life was Designer-made by the Most Briliant Brain in the Universe[/B] [B][I]So here's details to explain to your teachers & lecturers, on Monday, why true education is academic freedom of thought, not atheistic brainwashing[/I][/B] [B][URL="http://progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=85"][COLOR=#506aa8]ProgettoCosmo - Thermodynamics [B]disproves Darwin[/B][/COLOR][/URL][/B] [SIZE=-1]That contradicts [B]entropy[/B]. Moreover Neo-[B]Darwinism[/B] pretends species evolves [B].....[/B] until arriving to quantum particles and events for [B]disproving[/B] neo-[B]Darwinism[/B]. [B]...[/B][/SIZE] Evolutionary theory has two major claims. First it supports the hypothesis of abiogenesis (origin of life from matter alone); secondly it supports the hypothesis of Darwinian macroevolution (transformation of all species from a common ancestry), via random mutation and natural selection. [B]We will try to explain simply how laws of thermodynamics and entropy deny these major claims of evolutionary theory[/B]... [SIZE=-1][COLOR=#f07005]progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=85 - [/COLOR][URL="http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&safe=active&client=pub-8808028116415421&channel=9935310537&cof=FORID:1%3BGL:1%3BS:http://foru.ms%3BL:http://www3.foru.ms/images/misc/hdr_map3.jpg%3BLH:50%3BLW:468%3BLBGC:FF9900%3BBGC:%23f6f9fd%3BLC:%23506aa8%3BVLC:%23f07005%3BGALT:%23F07005%3BGFNT:%23666666%3BGIMP:%23666666%3B&domains=Foru.ms&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=related:progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php%3Foption%3Dcontent%26task%3Dview%26id%3D85"][COLOR=#666666]Similar pages[/COLOR][/URL][/SIZE] [B][URL="http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html"][COLOR=#506aa8]BrothersJudd Blog: SOME LIKE IT HOT (via Tom Corcoran):[/COLOR][/URL][/B] [SIZE=-1][B]Darwinism[/B], on the other hand, has to be consistent with it [[B]entropy[/B]] and isn't. [B]...[/B] the fact that order arises in violation of [B]entropy disproves [/B][B]...[/B][/SIZE] It is a well-known prediction of the second law that, in a closed system, every type of order is unstable and must eventually decrease, as everything tends toward more probable (more random) states. Not only will carbon and temperature distributions become more disordered (more uniform), but the performance of all electronic devices will deteriorate, not improve. [B]Natural forces, such as corrosion, erosion, fire and explosions, do not create order, they destroy it...[/B] [SIZE=-1][COLOR=#f07005]brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html - [/COLOR][URL="http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&safe=active&client=pub-8808028116415421&channel=9935310537&cof=FORID:1%3BGL:1%3BS:http://foru.ms%3BL:http://www3.foru.ms/images/misc/hdr_map3.jpg%3BLH:50%3BLW:468%3BLBGC:FF9900%3BBGC:%23f6f9fd%3BLC:%23506aa8%3BVLC:%23f07005%3BGALT:%23F07005%3BGFNT:%23666666%3BGIMP:%23666666%3B&domains=Foru.ms&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=related:brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html"][COLOR=#666666]Similar pages[/COLOR][/URL][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Entropy disproves Darwin
Top
Bottom