Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ah anyways I practise weekly with a .45 been doing so for the last 25 years. I enjoy going to the range and putting few dozen rounds into a target. A pistol is a tool and I had to use it once when i had a person break in to the house I was living as teenager when my family was gone. I had a crim break in and was going to tenderise me with a pitch fork I would have been his 4th nocth. But he wasn't expecting a skinny 17 year old having .45. Yes my father trained me in the use of it and he always had it by his bed loaded. When he and mom left for week he moved it to my bed side and reminded me what to do with it.
If we think we need BOTH God AND a gun, it's because we aren't REALLY trusting God. My trust is in God- guns can jam.
If I shoot someone who is trying to harm me, that's self-defense.be as wise as a serpent.... don't be harmful as it is.... God is our refuge and strength and He says vengence is HIS....
You forget many go hunting. I don't see that as not trusting.Well Peter was rebuked for having done so. It sounds as if you live in fear and for that I am very sorry
I don't believe shooting someone - even in self defence is the most merciful way of handling an attacker - remember that everything we do to another (including shooting) is the same as if we do it to Christ. Has the lesson "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword" lost all its meaning?
if it is them or me or my family or someone weak/helpless, then I believe we not only have the right but we "ought" to stop them.I would agree that there is a right to self defense - even the right to bear an arm. But a 'right' is not the same as an 'ought'. I don't believe shooting someone - even in self defence is the most merciful way of handling an attacker - remember that everything we do to another (including shooting) is the same as if we do it to Christ. Has the lesson "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword" lost all its meaning?
No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house. Mark 3:27
When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: Luke 11:21
I would agree that there is a right to self defense - even the right to bear an arm. But a 'right' is not the same as an 'ought'. I don't believe shooting someone - even in self defence is the most merciful way of handling an attacker - remember that everything we do to another (including shooting) is the same as if we do it to Christ. Has the lesson "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword" lost all its meaning?
Doing the most merciful thing is a good Christian principle... but let us first be merciful to the innocent victim of the attack, and only then to the assailant. If we spare the life of the assailant, but as a consequence let him kill the innocent victim, our concepts of mercy and justice are all screwed up. We're saving the assailant's life at the expense of the victim's life. I can't believe you don't see how wrong that is.I would agree that there is a right to self defense - even the right to bear an arm. But a 'right' is not the same as an 'ought'. I don't believe shooting someone - even in self defence is the most merciful way of handling an attacker - remember that everything we do to another (including shooting) is the same as if we do it to Christ. Has the lesson "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword" lost all its meaning?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?