Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You probably will. Sadly you do not seem to want to learn from your mistakes.That wasn't a mistake.
I've used it before, and I'll use it again until it goes out of vogue.
After all, "trinity" is also a near-obsolete term now, in favor of "triunity."
But I still use "trinity" for the sake of not having to be pedantic.
The strength of evidence is also based on the assumptions the theory is based on. Can you list the assumptions the dating techniques are based on. I once read a list of 20 such assumptions.
One particular article I have come across lately is by Shawn D. Pitman, M.D
Now tell me, would you go to a geochronology lab to be examined by a geochemist for a medical check up?
My great nephew can debate a well-trained scientist and win.I have seen Dr. Sean Pitman debate a well trained scientist and win.
My great nephew can debate a well-trained scientist and win.
The scientist just wouldn't know it.
But laymen like myself would know it!
And what is UCR?
If you want to you can learn how the science is done and read the peer reviewed articles on how they did their work for yourself.
Why?
Most of the so called assumptions are not assumptions.
That's absurd. The fields of geochemistry and geochronology have nothing to do with evolution and everything to do with chemistry and physics. Peer review means reviewed by experts in specific fields.Peer reviewed often means reviewed by evolutionists.
Simply put, science does not investigate the supernatural because it cannot observe the supernatural.Because science has been wrong more than once. Besides, science does not take into account the evidence from supernatural events like those recorded in the Bible. Science discounts, for example, the testimony of witnesses regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Yes, and as I previously described, he failed to include in his material how said problems are known and avoided.I suppose that you are referring to Dr. Sean Pitman!
Did you get your list from a reputable source?
Simply put, science does not investigate the supernatural because it cannot observe the supernatural.
I had in mind a list of over 20 scientific assumptions Dr. Erwin Taylor, an avowed evolutionist and UCR professor, founder of the UCR dating lab, used as an introduction to the scientific dating techniques.
But science does investigates historical facts and the testimony of witnesses. The same is true about criminal court cases.
The other day I ran across a site that appeared to an .edu address. In a way it was, but it was a students page, therefore a bit misleading to the authenticity of the content.Link? I tried looking it up, but could find no such list.
Eyewitness testimony is generally considerd one of the weakest forms of evidence in a court case.
You probably have not. You may have seen him debate a scientist, I doubt if you saw him win.I have seen Dr. Sean Pitman debate a well trained scientist and win.
And since you cannot supply this supposed list it is worthless. As I explained earlier many of the "assumptions" are probably not assumptions. Did you not understand my explanation? Slow down a bit and try to answer questions rather than simply making unsupported claims.Yes, I got this from Dr. Erwin Taylor, a UCR professor, author of the textbook he uses in his lectures at said university when teaching scientific dating techniques.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?