Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There was no Adam and Eve. There was no Flood or Noah's Ark. The opinion of ignorant people is all but meaningless.
I suppose you will next deny the existence of Jesus Christ, the man whose life forced historians and all people to date their birth as AD. Watch this video and tell me your reaction is!
How about his references to Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah, and Moses? Does the context allow for a mythical explanation?Since Jesus used poetic language all of the time, and he never said Adam and Eve are real his references to them is no different than saying that someone is as old as the hills.
My eyesight is failing, but my mind is expanding every time I read your comments!Has it ever occurred to you that you may be seeing less?
My eyesight is failing, but my mind is expanding every time I read your comments!
Did you watch the video from beginning to the end? Ho do you dare to compare an ant to an elephant?And I suppose you'll deny the existence of Woden!
No.Did Walt Disney play a big part in your life when you were growing up?
I don't watch videos.
That would be a no then.
Dr. John Ortberg was in my church yesterday, and he preached this sermon twice. I listened to him two times, and when I got home I searched the Internet, found his sermon, and watched it again. Evidently, my spiritual appetite is much different from yours.I watched half of it before giving up - you didn't miss much.
I suppose you will next deny the existence of Jesus Christ, the man whose life forced historians and all people to date their birth as AD. Watch this video and tell me your reaction is!
Fair enough.Bear in mind that the Red shift theory is being reconsidered and alternative explanations are being studied. Experts need time to make the proper adjustments.
We also know that empty space cannot stretch or expand, so all they did was exchange one absurdity for another. They then had to create a new absurdity called dark-energy in order to make sense of the absurdities they already created, and the absurdities just keep piling on.Galaxy Redshifts Reconsidered
“By referring to cosmological redshifts as Doppler shifts, we are insisting that our Newtonian intuition about motion still applies without significant change to the cosmological arena. A result of this thinking is that quasars now being detected at redshifts of Z = 4.0 would have to be interpreted as traveling a speeds of more than V = Z x c or 4 times the speed of light. This is, of course, quite absurd, because we all know that no physical object may travel faster than the speed of light.
Fair enough.
We also know that empty space cannot stretch or expand, so all they did was exchange one absurdity for another. They then had to create a new absurdity called dark-energy in order to make sense of the absurdities they already created, and the absurdities just keep piling on.
It is similar to creating a new lie in order to cover up a former lie.
Go ahead, but don't blame me if I continue to point out your error.I know that, but I found no prohibition against using standard dictionary definitions in this thread. If you don’t like the way I talk, please ignore my comments from now on! And post the following warning: “Only trained scientists allowed to post comments!
Actually many doubt the existence of "Jesus Christ". You gave him a title that many historians and scholars will disagree with. There probably was a Jesus, though there are more and more serious historians that are beginning to doubt even this claim.I suppose you will next deny the existence of Jesus Christ, the man whose life forced historians and all people to date their birth as AD. Watch this video and tell me your reaction is!
Mere poetic language at best. We know there was no Noah's Ark, that story was refuted even before the theory of evolution came along. Archaeologists will tell you that there was no Exodus as described in the Bible. That puts a huge burden of proof on you if you want to claim that Moses was real.How about his references to Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah, and Moses? Does the context allow for a mythical explanation?
Assuming there was such a person as Jesus Christ.How about his references to Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah, and Moses? Does the context allow for a mythical explanation?
When I was a teenager I could see without glasses. So you are right—my eyesight is failing, but my mind's eye is improving every time I read your comments. They force me to decide whether to abandon my worldview and embrace yours and my faith grows an inch or two.
If you want to entice me to join you, start by building a sure foundation for your evolutionary edifice. So far, you cannot tell me how life started, while I can. You cannot tell me what came first: the egg or the chicken. I can: the chicken.
You cannot see the intricate design in nature;
I can.
You claim that apes are my true ancestors; I know that this can’t be true.
You cannot predict how this world will end!
I can, and I know that my prediction is credible because it rests on a prophetical prognosis that was written centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ and so far it has not failed. Read Daniel 2.
You believe that Jesus was a man—no more than that. I know that he was killed and his tomb was never found. He is alive, and he is my friend who guides my life. Why should I embrace your religion?
I know that, but I found no prohibition against using standard dictionary definitions in this thread. If you don’t like the way I talk, please ignore my comments from now on! And post the following warning: “Only trained scientists allowed to post comments!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?