Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So even if go to Hawaii and watch lava solidify in to brand new rocks, you are saying that those rocks are old? By what measure?
As you have described it before, embedded age is the inclusion of daughter isotopes to give rocks the appearance of being old when they are dated with radiometric methods.
I take it that you are running away from those previous positions?
It does not matter how you describe it, it still leads to a deceitful God and that seems rather blasphemous to me.Give my regards to Don Ho.
No, I have never described it like that.
I always describe embedded age in three words: maturity without history.
I don't doubt that you do, seeing as how you try so hard to put words in my mouth.
I've seen you do it with others too.
I guess we all have our style of debating.
No, we aren't. We will continue to show how your claims of embedded age make God into a deceiver.
BioLogos can take a hike.And again, the scientists at BioLogos have a good answer that AV should heed.
Seriously? You can't understand that all of geology refuting the Flood, all of physics, biology, and geology telling us that the Adam and Eve story is just that are not cases of a your personal version of God being deceitful? It seems that other Christians have no problem with this and that is why they accept science. I do not know how I could show you what you are implying with your beliefs;Suit yourself.
But if you need to misquote me so much, and if you need me to put words in my mouth to do it, I'd say you're having a problem showing how my claims of embedded age make God into a deceiver.
The Arab phone seems to be your tool of choice to wrest what others say to your advantage, and discussing things with you is an exercise in "I didn't say that."
I have, I was merely showing you that you did not have to drop your Christian beliefs to accept reality. I was trying to help you not to harm you.BioLogos can take a hike.
How about you deal with my claims on your own, and not hide behind someone else's apron strings.
Wow -- just wow.It does not matter how you describe it, it still leads to a deceitful God and that seems rather blasphemous to me.
I know, it is amazing that you do not see how truly blasphemous you are in making a false idol of the Bible, and even after you were warned not to.Wow -- just wow.
Suit yourself.
But if you need to misquote me so much, and if you need me to put words in my mouth to do it, I'd say you're having a problem showing how my claims of embedded age make God into a deceiver.
The Arab phone seems to be your tool of choice to wrest what others say to your advantage, and discussing things with you is an exercise in "I didn't say that."
Seriously? You can't understand that all of geology refuting the Flood, all of physics, biology, and geology telling us that the Adam and Eve story is just that are not cases of a your personal version of God being deceitful?
It seems that other Christians have no problem with this and that is why they accept science.
I do not know how I could show you what you are implying with your beliefs;
Give my regards to Don Ho.
No, I have never described it like that.
I always describe embedded age in three words: maturity without history.
Don't Sanballat me.I have, I was merely showing you that you did not have to drop your Christian beliefs to accept reality. I was trying to help you not to harm you.
I suppose only I could get and atheist and agnostic worried about someone blaspheming God, eh?I know, it is amazing that you do not see how truly blasphemous you are in making a false idol of the Bible, and even after you were warned not to.
I have directly quoted you.
I have shown how your claims of embedded age make God into a deceiver.
You know that I would never do that.Don't Sanballat me.
It won't work.
I'm sure you think you have.
Now your job gets much tougher:
Convince me to do the same.
The part I don't understand is why one feels the need distort and/or misrepresent well understood science to support ones religious beliefs. To me that implies insecurity in ones faith.I know, it is amazing that you do not see how truly blasphemous you are in making a false idol of the Bible, and even after you were warned not to.
Yet another post where you run away from the facts.
If I go back to previous threads and find where you have made this claim, will you acknowledge it?
In the case of radioactive dating, you have described it as including daughter isotopes in the rocks.
If this is not what you are claiming, then you have a much more serious problem.
You have no explanation for the daughter isotopes found in the rocks other than a real history that is billions of years.
I shouldn't either, if I used your style.I shouldn't have to convince anyone to deal with facts and reality.
Paper victories only look good on paper.Your refusal to deal with these problems only demonstrates that I am right.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?