Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Elon Musk skynet satellites on collision course with space station full of astronauts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="timewerx" data-source="post: 76491538" data-attributes="member: 314730"><p>The 2nd link mentioned ADS's destructiveness to unshielded electronics.</p><p></p><p>If you use lower frequency, you'll achieve deeper penetration of the body. It's mentioned in the first link.</p><p></p><p>The lower the frequency, the deeper the penetration and the more lethal the effect would become due to damage to internal organs (although an assassin would likely try to minimize damaging internal organs to minimize evidence). Because the ADS is designed to be non-lethal, the frequencies chosen avoid deep penetration. But wouldn't be that hard to *illegally* modify it to work in lethal mode in unsanctioned / covert missions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>EM shielding tend to be made of conductive or semi-conductive materials. The good news, it can make the device immune to damage EMP or high energy radio beams.</p><p></p><p>The bad news, the shielding can act as an antenna (because they tend to be made of conductive or semi-conductive materials) and as I've mentioned many times before, antenna inside the brain is totally bad and avoid at all cost.</p><p></p><p>Even without shield, the chip itself is made of either or both semi or conductive materials and still makes it an antenna.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I also agree here. I don't mind interfacing with the brain as long as it can be done without getting a chip inside the brain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="timewerx, post: 76491538, member: 314730"] The 2nd link mentioned ADS's destructiveness to unshielded electronics. If you use lower frequency, you'll achieve deeper penetration of the body. It's mentioned in the first link. The lower the frequency, the deeper the penetration and the more lethal the effect would become due to damage to internal organs (although an assassin would likely try to minimize damaging internal organs to minimize evidence). Because the ADS is designed to be non-lethal, the frequencies chosen avoid deep penetration. But wouldn't be that hard to *illegally* modify it to work in lethal mode in unsanctioned / covert missions. EM shielding tend to be made of conductive or semi-conductive materials. The good news, it can make the device immune to damage EMP or high energy radio beams. The bad news, the shielding can act as an antenna (because they tend to be made of conductive or semi-conductive materials) and as I've mentioned many times before, antenna inside the brain is totally bad and avoid at all cost. Even without shield, the chip itself is made of either or both semi or conductive materials and still makes it an antenna. I also agree here. I don't mind interfacing with the brain as long as it can be done without getting a chip inside the brain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Elon Musk skynet satellites on collision course with space station full of astronauts
Top
Bottom