• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Elderly woman first to be arrested in Scotland under ‘buffer zone law’ criticized by JD Vance

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
180,458
65,019
Woods
✟5,731,886.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
A 74-year-old woman has been arrested near a Glasgow hospital, marking the first case under Scotland's new "buffer zone law." She was subsequently charged under the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act.

Police Scotland said they received a report last week about people gathered close to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, where abortions are provided, according to Sky News. Officers found a sign bearing the words "coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want," which the arrested woman had allegedly been holding.

The police arrested her and removed the sign from the area.

Continued below.
 

JustaPewFiller

Active Member
Apr 1, 2024
185
156
59
Florida
✟41,729.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It is not the OP's fault. But the headline from the article is poorly worded.

When I first read the headline I thought, "Why is Vance criticizing that poor, little, old lady?!" :eek:

Maybe it is just me, but I saw nothing offensive about the lady's sign.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
180,458
65,019
Woods
✟5,731,886.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is not the OP's fault. But the headline from the article is poorly worded.

When I first read the headline I thought, "Why is Vance criticizing that poor, little, old lady?!" :eek:

Maybe it is just me, but I saw nothing offensive about the lady's sign.
Yeah it confused me as well till I read the content.
 
Upvote 0