Sorry if it was morbid and dark, but it was the only poem in my collection that touched on atheism, and it that part focused on the darker aspects of Christianity's love. I was going to suggest more poetry, a back and forth between atheists, but RJ Harmony has posted.
And, while RJ Harmony's poem falls slightly outside of the context of this thread, I'd like to comment on it a little. I thought about trying to be soft, but I'm going to give you my honest opinion, first in the poem and then a workshop critique presented backwards. In a normal workshop I would give the good first and then the negative, while here it is opposite.
RJHarmony84 said:
Gecko Deams
Listless Life...Ah, comforts fount in small things!
I lie like the gecko in the sun,
I take this as an insulting jab against atheists, whether you intended it or not. It implies laziness and shallowness and this is where I find myself first dissasociated from the poem.
RJHarmony84 said:
Still--waiting for Fortune to flutter by...
And burned by the touch of Cruel Experience
I've heard this before in apologetics, that we're waiting, or that we've been hurt and hardened by Christianity in the past. It's not a set of phrases that encourage any kind of empathy. The touch of Cruel Experience are obviously important (note the capital letters) but I have no idea why.
RJHarmony84 said:
I struggle to slumber in peace...
So soft, sleep, and so full of wonders--
Nightly roaming, free, in Paradise
And I fall willing prey to such forgetful bliss...
Another thing that I hear often in apologetics, that atheists are secretly theists (specifically Christians), in this case relating to these heavenly dreams that the gecko doesn't know about while awake. If this isn't an attempt at apologetics, then you've just completely shifted the environment of the gecko with no real explanation as to why.
RJHarmony84 said:
Can any other world be so bright?
Any magic or mystery, be more fulfilling?
The implied answer is "no" and that leads to the question, "Where is the gecko when asleep?"
RJHarmony84 said:
I cling to sweet shadows, hoping
that in this place where dreams are Real
Old wounds can, maybe, Heal...
See above about the "I've been hurt" apologetics, and the dreams quickly morph into:
RJHarmony84 said:
And Joy, Jewel-faced, gleams once more
Within my reach...
. . . if only we would accept Christ.
I was wondering why a Christian would write a poem to be submitted into an atheism forum even before I started this. I hoped that it would be an exploration of an atheistic point of view by a Christian. However, the exploration is . . . well . . . not to be offensive, shallow. The writer completely removes him or herself from the subject matter to be explored, using analogies for the way that they are viewed on a two dimensional basis, and that makes me understand that no empathy for the subject was even attempted.
The main point of this thread seems to be to assign a metaphor, the gecko, and then figure out the best way to translate apologetic arguements into that situation. Well, it seems to have succeeded, but I can't say that I'm necessarily impressed. After all, it makes a judgment call about the intelligence of the reader, and that the poem's statements (at least one of which is a stereotype) must be correct.
To improve the poem you might want to consider finding some point that you can empathize with in the gecko and then exploring your arguments from that point: If you can find some part of the gecko to empathize with, perhaps I can use it as well.
There is, also, little tension, and you might want to think about how to create that with a position that must be undeniably correct. If the answer is so obvious to the gecko, how come the analogy fails when the metaphor is reversed?
However, your meter is good, and the metaphor certainly shows significant talent. I think that you could use lineation (and I'm big on lineation) to emphasize certain points and create a different feel from the awake and sleeping sections of the poem.
Hope that you keep writing,
Spherical Time