Easy questions for a Creationist to answer.

card · Nov 10, 2006

If we are the main reason why everything else exists why are we so much like everything else?
don't you think we should stand out a little more than we do after all God made us in his own image?

If the earth was Gods pride and joy why did he stick it out on the end of our Galaxy so far from the centre?
and make our galaxy just one of millions?

Why do WE revolve around everything else and only a little pock marked moon revolve around us?

From everything the Bible tells us WE are the only reason everything in the universe exists,
yet we are just one of thousands of animals on this planet.

Aron-Ra · Nov 10, 2006

Great. Card vs JohnR7
There's a match made in Hell.
I'm outta here.

card · Nov 10, 2006

So WE are not the only reason everything in the universe exists, what other reason did God have for making it?
Please no Bible quotes.

And this is a strange thing for a Creationist to say: 'We would not be here if it were not for the moon' God was unable to
overcome the gravity problem then.

Sorry John please don't answer, this whole business is getting me down, let's leave it.

mark kennedy · Nov 10, 2006

card said:
If we are the main reason why everything else exists why are we so much like everything else?
don't you think we should stand out a little more than we do after all God made us in his own image?

Ok, let me ask your rethorical question with a question. If the level of divergence between the chimpanzee and human is so simular then why do evolutionists lie through their teeth about it?

If the earth was Gods pride and joy why did he stick it out on the end of our Galaxy so far from the centre?
and make our galaxy just one of millions?

Of course you know so much about the universe since you have crossed from one end to the other conjuring up your questions for the Creator.

Why do WE revolve around everything else and only a little pock marked moon revolve around us?

Why does everyones defintion of science revolved around an apriori assumption?

From everything the Bible tells us WE are the only reason everything in the universe exists,
yet we are just one of thousands of animals on this planet.

Quote the book chapter and verse because your generalities are boring me to death.

Ondoher · Nov 10, 2006

mark kennedy said:
Ok, let me ask your rethorical question with a question. If the level of divergence between the chimpanzee and human is so simular then why do evolutionists lie through their teeth about it?

They don't. These numbers are currently being refined, and comparisons come in many forms.

However you slice it, humans and chimpanzees are more similar to each other than either is similar to a gorilla.

mark kennedy · Nov 10, 2006

Ondoher said:
They don't. These numbers are currently being refined, and comparisons come in many forms.

Divergence is growing as we speak and the size of the genome and number of genes is shrinking.

However you slice it, humans and chimpanzees are more similar to each other than either is similar to a gorilla.

The cranial capacity of chimpanzees and gorillas is comparable

Aron-Ra · Nov 10, 2006

mark kennedy said:
Ok, let me ask your rethorical question with a question. If the level of divergence between the chimpanzee and human is so simular then why do evolutionists lie through their teeth about it?

You'd better defend that accusation with a specific citation. Because I can show where you have lied through your teeth multiple times specifically trying to conceal or ignore the fact that, if humans and chimps are so uniquely different, why are we both apes?

Ondoher · Nov 10, 2006

mark kennedy said:
Divergence is growing as we speak and the size of the genome and number of genes is shrinking.

I see little reason to suppose that a more refined estimate will see the difference between humans and chimpanzees grow substantially. As it is, you like to exaggerate the current level of differences.

mark kennedy said:
The cranial capacity of chimpanzees and gorillas is comparable

And this refutes cladistic analysis that concludes that humans are more similar to chimpanzees than either is to gorillas how?

joey444 · Nov 10, 2006

I've noticed that no matter what question someone starts the topic out with, someone will say something incredibly stupid and the topic will change within two pages to "Evolution's impossible because a monkey never gave birth to a human."

I'm just gonna see if I'm right.

card · Nov 11, 2006

joey444 said:
I've noticed that no matter what question someone starts the topic out with, someone will say something incredibly stupid and the topic will change within two pages to "Evolution's impossible because a monkey never gave birth to a human."

I'm just gonna see if I'm right.

The reason for this is because we have some creationists here who register as non-creationists,
(might even be the same person)
if they see a post that will give them trouble one of them answers the question with a load of rubbish
and another comes in as a non-creationists to counter the rubbish with more rubbish, that way they
can steer any comments away from the original question, I have noticed this before, it's a bit sad
really but if they have no answers to the questions what else can they do?
Also, if they can make their comments complicated or unreadable the reader loses interest and moves to another post.
This post is a perfect example of this.

Aron-Ra · Nov 11, 2006

card said:
If we are the main reason why everything else exists why are we so much like everything else?
don't you think we should stand out a little more than we do after all God made us in his own image?

If the earth was Gods pride and joy why did he stick it out on the end of our Galaxy so far from the centre?
and make our galaxy just one of millions?

Why do WE revolve around everything else and only a little pock marked moon revolve around us?

From everything the Bible tells us WE are the only reason everything in the universe exists,
yet we are just one of thousands of animals on this planet.

I criticized your style in another thread. But you deserve a compliment for these questions. They are very thought provoking for those who will evoke enough thought to consider them.

card · Nov 11, 2006

Aron-Ra, that let's you out.

Aron-Ra · Nov 11, 2006

card said:
Aron-Ra, that let's you out.

Out of what?

AV1611VET · Nov 20, 2011

card said:
If we are the main reason why everything else exists why are we so much like everything else?

Because we have a Common Designer.

Tiberius · Nov 22, 2011

So a Toyota landcruiser and a Range Rover (which share many common elements, just as Humans and Chimps share many common elements) must also have a common designer?

AV1611VET · Nov 22, 2011

Tiberius said:
So a Toyota landcruiser and a Range Rover (which share many common elements, just as Humans and Chimps share many common elements) must also have a common designer?

A Toyota and Ranger Rover could have a common designer -- yes.

The fact that they do not, has no bearing on the point in discussion.

Cabal · Nov 22, 2011

AV1611VET said:
A Toyota and Ranger Rover could have a common designer -- yes.

The fact that they do not, has no bearing on the point in discussion.

Yes, it does - it means your answer is not conclusive - so try harder.

also necrofail etc

AV1611VET · Nov 22, 2011

Cabal said:
Yes, it does - it means your answer is not conclusive - so try harder.

What do you mean 'my answer is not conclusive'?

You answer it then, please:

Can a Toyota and a Range Rover have a common designer?

(And do be conclusive, if you can.)

Cabal said:
also necrofail etc

We'll see.

Cabal · Nov 22, 2011

AV1611VET said:
What do you mean 'my answer is not conclusive'?

Having similar characteristics is a trait common to both having a common designer and not having a common designer. Ergo, it's not conclusive evidence of having a common designer.

You answer it then, please:

Can a Toyota and a Range Rover have a common designer?

(And do be conclusive, if you can.)

They CAN, yes, but that's not the point - you claimed that another pair of objects with similar characteristics DO. They CAN have a common designer by virtue of their similarity, but that doesn't necessarily mean they DO. All one can infer is that it's possible (depending on one's conception of God, although as ever it involves throwing God's omnipotence under a bus when the going gets tough) but not necessarily probable.

AV1611VET said:
We'll see.

Bit late for that

AV1611VET · Nov 22, 2011

Cabal said:
Having similar characteristics is a trait common to both having a common designer and not having a common designer. Ergo, it's not conclusive evidence of having a common designer.

Let me guess -- but it is conclusive of a common ancestor, right?

A Toyota and Rover don't have a common designer, yet they have a common ancestor?

Cabal said:
They CAN, yes, but that's not the point - you claimed that another pair of objects with similar characteristics DO. They CAN have a common designer by virtue of their similarity, but that doesn't necessarily mean they DO.

It doesn't mean they don't, either.

I'm entitled to what I believe, and you're entitled to what you believe.

And speaking of belief, I take it you don't believe in ontological reductionism?

Cabal said:
Bit late for that

No, it's not.

This thread is still growing.

I wouldn't call that 'necrofail' -- would you?

Easy questions for a Creationist to answer.

Active Member

Senior Veteran

Active Member

Natura non facit saltum

Veteran

Natura non facit saltum

Senior Veteran

Veteran

Active Member

Active Member

Senior Veteran

Active Member

Senior Veteran

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency