Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Driving Unhealthy Hypocrisy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ACougar" data-source="post: 57794600" data-attributes="member: 6922"><p>How can you have public property with anarchy? The very idea of public property is socialist. Then there is the matter of maintaining the roads, policing the roads, not to mention building new roads when the old roads can no longer handle the traffic.</p><p> </p><p>In Europe the railroads are public, and they seem to be quiet efficient. They took a socialist approach instead of a capitalist aproach... because they realize that both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. We on the other hand seem to think that adding or making things more capitalist is always the solution, it's like having a car mechanic who is really good with a wrench but refuses to use any other tools.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ACougar, post: 57794600, member: 6922"] How can you have public property with anarchy? The very idea of public property is socialist. Then there is the matter of maintaining the roads, policing the roads, not to mention building new roads when the old roads can no longer handle the traffic. In Europe the railroads are public, and they seem to be quiet efficient. They took a socialist approach instead of a capitalist aproach... because they realize that both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. We on the other hand seem to think that adding or making things more capitalist is always the solution, it's like having a car mechanic who is really good with a wrench but refuses to use any other tools. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Driving Unhealthy Hypocrisy
Top
Bottom