Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The modern cave dwellers of condos and skyscrapers have chosen to omit truth from their knowledge.Cavemen didn't have science. That is why they turned to magic as an explanation.
Neither do I.I meant it in the sense that I do not see why the two have to be seen as conflicting.
Where science disagrees with the Bible, science can take a hike.
You NEVER checked the past,
you checked in with present state ideas and tried to hammer the past into submission.
Black magic.
Science can't disagree with the Bible, yet it can find out about the physical universe?Science can't disagree with the Bible, although scientists can. Science is just a way of finding out about the physical universe.
Okay ... we sync the Bible to science.Almost always when science and the bible disagree the fault does not lie in the bible itself but rather in the way in which we interpret the bible.
Science can't disagree with the Bible, yet it can find out about the physical universe?
Good for science.Yep. Science is just a method. So no way to disagree with the Bible. And yes, it's been very successful in telling us about the physical universe.
It is not a "claim." Call it what you want, do with it what you want.
I have pointed to a world of physical evidence (the world), and also to spiritual evidence. Don't blame me because you don't know what you are looking at.
You definition of demonstrating evidence is inadequate. That may (for the umptheenth time) work in you little world...but...HELLO!...we are NOT talking about your little world.
It isn't knowledge. It is faith based belief.No, what I have is "knowledge"...that your kind of evidence will not convey, and "belief" and "faith" have nothing to do with it. HELLO! How many times do I have to tell you that?!
We can learn plenty we did not personally observe. Get a grip. That doesn't include overruling the Almighty on how the future or past was and will be of course.Sorry, your postmoderney story that we can't learn about anything we didn't personally observe isn't very persuasive. Evidence from numerous sources says you're wrong.
Sure 2 examples. We all need a laugh.If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence. And we have done that repeatedly. Would you like to see some examples?
The evidence tells of His magic, but science is too dumb to get it.Sorry, your magic won't stand up to the evidence.
We can learn plenty we did not personally observe.
Sure 2 examples. We all need a laugh.
Only within limits. Otherwise you get into prophesy and dreams.If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence.
Fine with me, but not because of any reason Hux imagined. Rapid evolving in the former nature allowed Eden's creatures to move on out over the earth. If a bird evolved into a little dino and later bigger...whoopee do!1. Based on anatomical data, Huxley wrote that there must have been transitionals between dinosaurs and birds. We have since found many of them.
Maybe they had abortions back then like they do today?Why'd he wait so long?
Abortions have been with us for quite a while. They were not as safe as today, but they used to be done by a Hebrew priest, if the wife had been supposedly cheating on the husband.Maybe they had abortions back then like they do today?
Indeed. It's like we had to work it out on our own.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?