Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Its not a frog. Its a half fish and half amphibian. basically the death blow to the video posted earlier. It is a living transitional species, that many creationists wish did not exist because it blows their unfounded claims right out of the water
The main differences between sceptics and religious believers are in their motivation and the way they form and maintain their conclusions or beliefs.Again, I am not as skeptical as you.
Darn, good poster. I am just learning about this argument, so don't think of it as a huge victory. Is there truly any proof that this is an evolutionary step between a fish and a frog? How would this prove God did not create all living things?
However, it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. I dont think anyone here is arguing that the theory of evolution proves that your God doesnt exist. Most non-believers would argue there is simply no sound reason to believe your God exists. What the theory of evolution shows is that the true explanation for the diversity of life we see on the planet today is not God did it. In fact, God did it has never been the true explanation for anything at all. There are many times when God did it has been shown to be a false explanation, but not once has it ever been shown to be a true explanation.Great video.
That's because anything that gets in the way is summarily dismissed or labeled 'evidence pending'.However, it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. I don’t think anyone here is arguing that the theory of evolution proves that your God doesn’t exist. Most non-believers would argue there is simply no sound reason to believe your God exists. What the theory of evolution shows is that the true explanation for the diversity of life we see on the planet today is not “God did it”. In fact, “God did it” has never been the true explanation for anything at all. There are many times when “God did it” has been shown to be a false explanation, but not once has it ever been shown to be a true explanation.
Mark 16:15-18
15. And He said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
16. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
17. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
18. They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Jesus Christ said it, and it has been done.
That's because anything that gets in the way is summarily dismissed or labeled 'evidence pending'.
Case in point: the Flood --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Exodus --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the conquest of Canaan --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the virgin birth of Christ --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: Jesus walking on water --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Resurrection --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: speaking in tongues --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the division of the years in B.C. and A.D. --- it would not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the return of Israel to her homeland --- it would not have happened sans God.
When you summarily dismiss so much written history, is it any wonder you're claiming: 'not once has it ever been shown to be a true explanation'?
First off, you'd have to show that it did indeed happened. Second, unless you're clairvoyant or a god yourself (which you seem to suggest at times) you cannot say with any certainty whether those things would've happened without a god.That's because anything that gets in the way is summarily dismissed or labeled 'evidence pending'.
Case in point: the Flood --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Exodus --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the conquest of Canaan --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the virgin birth of Christ --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: Jesus walking on water --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Resurrection --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: speaking in tongues --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the division of the years in B.C. and A.D. --- it would not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the return of Israel to her homeland --- it would not have happened sans God.
You mean so much written material without supporting evidence. The Iliad has a lot of supporting historic evidence for much of it, but can we believe all of it without evidence? No. Same with the Bible. Some truth does not make the whole book true, regardless of any special pleading from you.When you summarily dismiss so much written history, is it any wonder you're claiming: 'not once has it ever been shown to be a true explanation'?
That's because anything that gets in the way is summarily dismissed or labeled 'evidence pending'.
Case in point: the Flood --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Exodus --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the conquest of Canaan --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the virgin birth of Christ --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: Jesus walking on water --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the Resurrection --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: speaking in tongues --- it could not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the division of the years in B.C. and A.D. --- it would not have happened sans God.
Case in point: the return of Israel to her homeland --- it would not have happened sans God.
When you summarily dismiss so much written history, is it any wonder you're claiming: 'not once has it ever been shown to be a true explanation'?
No, I wouldn't --- it was already confirmed by those who were there.First off, you'd have to show that it did indeed happened.
You can quote any diabolical mimicry you want --- just don't expect us Bible-believers to fall for it.Should i start quoting mythology too and list would could not have happened as an argument for why x is true.
Now why didn't God (Jesus), Who was just a mile or so away, show up and, for the sake of those scientists just say, "Bring me another blind man, and I'll show you what I did"?
Because He wasn't here to put on a rodeo show --- He had a job to do, and He took it seriously.I dunno, why didn't he? He could have (allegedly).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?